|


Asia-focused private equity funds
surpassed the total capital raised in Europe in the third quarter – the
first time in the history of the industry – as turmoil in the credit
markets forced investors to pull back sharply from the sector.
About 25 funds focused on Asia and other
regions outside of the US and Europe, amassed $12.5bn (£7.2bn) in the third
quarter, according to data compiled by Private Equity Intelligence, an
independent research group. -
2008 October 7 FINANCIAL
TIMES

Advantage Asia
Asia should leverage on the fact that its
people and companies are comparatively debt free, and unlock its innate
spending and investment power for the benefit of the region. We
are witnessing the greatest global
financial upheaval in almost eight decades since the Great Depression.
Nearer home we were ravaged by the Asian crisis in the late '90s and Latin
America suffered its own 'tequila' crisis. However, neither of these crises
compare in scale and impact to the current one that originated in the
developed world. Whilst the emerging market crises led to the destruction of
a few tens of billions of dollars, the current turmoil could end up costing
trillions. If the former was a tremor, the latter is a veritable earthquake
measuring 9 on the Richter scale.
What caused the current crisis?
It does not matter whether you are an
individual, company or country - when you spend more than you earn, and
continue the pattern for many years, eventually you will go bankrupt. It all
started with easy availability of credit and banks paying scant regard to
pricing for risk. Any individual irrespective of how much he or she earned
(a proxy for repayment capacity) could borrow to buy a house. Housing prices
were supposed to keep going up and up, so repayment capacity was a
non-issue!
Moreover, if the borrower did not have
the cash to meet his mortgage payments he could always borrow against any
one of his many credit cards (occasionally from the same lender), and pay a
nominal monthly amount to keep his card obligations 'current'. The banks
that made these loans could also rely on some financial alchemist to pool
thousands of such loans, get them rated and then sell that pool in the form
of securitised loans to institutional investors. As it turned out, some of
these structures became financial weapons of mass destruction.
Also on the institutional side, banks
were willing to extend unsustainable levels of leverage to buy out firms
that took companies private. Underpinning the leverage was the assumption
that the revenues and profits of the companies would grow nicely ad
infinitum. Then the tide ran out. As they say, it is only when the waters
recede that you know if the swimmer is wearing trunks.
Vacillation and denial
A critical aspect of the initial phase of
the current crisis was the vacillation of financial institutions and policy
makers, particularly in the United States. At first there was widespread
denial that a crisis was forming. Then bankers prematurely declared the
crisis over - as late as April 2008 the CEO of a major institution averred
that the sub-prime problem was 'in the eighth inning or maybe the top of the
ninth of a nine-inning baseball game'.
On the policy side, recognising systemic
risk, the US government belatedly but rightly stepped in to officially
support Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the institutions that fuelled the
mortgage boom. A week later, however, reverting to free market principles
and moral hazard concerns, they let Lehman go bankrupt. A few days later it
was back to systemic risk with the bailout of AIG. Congress then voted
against the administration's initial US$700 billion bailout plan, adding to
erosion in market confidence.
Since then, governments worldwide have
stepped up activity. The US bailout plan has been passed by the Houses. UK
led the way in taking decisive, sure-footed action to recapitalise and add
liquidity to the banking system, a plan that has received plaudits and is
being copied by others. There have been a slew of government guarantees of
deposits in various countries and a coordinated interest rate cut among
major central banks.
The immediate lesson seems to be that
when you have an extraordinary situation you need to act boldly, quickly and
decisively, and not get bogged down by ideology and doctrines. When you have
a fire you need to get the fire extinguisher out, and worry later about the
longer term consequences of the chemicals on the ozone layer.
How is all this impacting Asia?
Over the last year it has been a tale of
two worlds: boom across Asia and some emerging regions, in contrast to ever
deepening financial crisis in the West. However, years of globalisation have
placed Asia closer to the global economy. We are no longer an island. Large
domestic demand, fiscal prudence, significant foreign reserves, low external
indebtedness and the acceptable leverage of the corporate sector will allow
the region to cope better with the financial fallout, but Asia will not be
entirely insulated. The good news is that post the 1997/98 crisis, Asian
countries and companies sharpened their acts and got rid of the flab. This
will now serve them well. Sweet indeed are the uses of adversity.
Lessons from the crisis
What are some longer term lessons that
Asia should remember from 1997 and learn from the current crisis?
Although Asia, as a region, is generating
huge reserves and surpluses, most of this is recycled through Western
financial institutions, some of whom are currently shut for business. Very
few of the top 50 banks and investment banks in the world are from emerging
markets, and the few who make the list like the Brazilian and Chinese are
too domestically focused to play a significant role outside their national
confines. Is the time ripe for Asia to use some of its surpluses to build
its own global financial champions? This would require a level of regional
cooperation that has not been evidenced to date.
One of the many lessons of the 1997/98
crisis in Asia was the need to focus not just on solvency but also
liquidity. Singapore already has one of the largest US dollar interbank
markets in the region. Could Singapore further expand to become the
pre-eminent dollar liquidity provider outside of New York? Also, we learnt
it is best to deregulate one's financial sector at a pace suited to one's
domestic needs. Deregulating too quickly without the appropriate
institutional infrastructure can be as bad as not deregulating. However, it
would be a pity if Asian economies used the cloud cover of the de facto
nationalisation of many US and Western banks to derail or slow down the
deregulation of their own financial and other sectors. Now is perhaps the
time to press home Asia's comparative advantage by deepening and
deregulating its economies.
The financial sector should be allowed to
channel the region's high savings and reserves into increased investment, to
allow people to borrow against future income and firms to access markets
when and where needed. We need to leverage on the fact that our people and
companies are comparatively debt free, and unlock our innate spending and
investment power for the benefit of our region.
If Asia and the Middle East combine their
collective intellectual and money power, they could create over time genuine
alternatives to 'NyLon' (New York and London) as global financial centres.
Asia and the Middle East have abundant capital as evidenced by the fact that
their sovereign wealth funds have recently been the major providers of new
capital to stressed Western institutions. However, what the two regions lack
is some of the other enabling ecosystems. These would include further
deregulation and opening up of financial, legal, insurance and many
inter-related sectors and a focus on making some of these cities even better
places to live.
When the majority of MBA graduates at
major Western schools start telling campus recruiters 'Shanghai, Mumbai,
Dubai or bye-bye' we'll know we have cracked it.
- 2008 November 1 BUSINESS
TIMES The author is V
Shankar Member-group management committee Standard Chartered
Bank
Rising
Powers of Asia Sitting On A Growing Stash of Cash
Could there be a more telling sign of Asia's rise – the “development
bank” from across the world coming to the rescue of an American financial
titan. It is becoming a common story these days.
Citibank was bailed out by the government of Singapore in combination
with the Kuwait Investment Authority and a Saudi prince. Morgan Stanley had
help from the China Investment Corp., UBS from the Government of Singapore
Investment Corp. and Merrill Lynch from the Korea Investment Corp. The China
Development Bank recently shook up German finance by putting in the highest
bid for the giant Dresdner Bank, only to see Germany's Commerzbank win the
takeover prize instead.
As Gerard Lyons, chief economist at Standard Chartered, told me on the
phone from London yesterday, “the balance of financial power appears to be
shifting from the West to the East.”
With the latest surge in Asian money into the troubled banks and
investment houses of the Western world comes the usual hand wringing about
how the crown jewels of Western finance are falling into foreign
hands. But isn't this supposed to be how things are meant to work in
an open, globalized financial system? Money flows from those who have it to
those who need it, helping both sides prosper.
That is exactly what is happening today. Hit by the subprime mortgage
crisis in the United States, then a global credit crunch, some of the top
names in global finance are passing the hat. It just so happens that at the
very time that these storied institutions need cash, the rising powers of
Asia are sitting on a growing stack of it. China's success at selling to the
markets of the world has endowed it with an incredible $1.8-trillion in
foreign exchange reserves. The little city-state of Singapore controls vast
wealth through its Temasek Holdings.
Such sovereign wealth funds – government-controlled investment houses
– now control more than $3-trillion in assets. China's alone controls
$200-billion. Some of the richest of these funds are in Asia, though Middle
Eastern oil states and oil-rich Norway are also big players.
As the money piles up, the Asians are naturally trying to protect
themselves by diversifying their holdings. The credit crunch has provided
them the perfect opportunity, opening the doors of troubled finance houses
in Europe and North America. It is a match made in heaven. Katinka Barysch,
deputy director of the Centre for European Reform, said yesterday that if
you're a troubled New York or London bank, “you're just happy that there's
someone out there who's sitting on $500-billion to $600-billion and willing
to help you out of your financial crisis.”
Fears that the Asians will come to dominate the financial capitals of the
West are overblown. Most sovereign wealth funds and similar entities are
conservative, long-term, value investors looking to improve their investment
returns, not run roughshod over someone else's country. Their increasingly
bold forays into global finance are a sign not only of their rising wealth
but of their desire to learn how to play the game of global capitalism. That
can only be a good thing. - 2008
September 3 GLOBE
& MAIL

Mass affluent and high net worth
individuals in Singapore would like to invest more into property, a survey
by Barclays Wealth has found. But those surveyed also indicate that in a
time of increased economic volatility they would like to raise their
allocations into cash, and take on more risk.
Barclays has just published the latest in
its series of 'Wealth Insights' publications, this time looking into
behavioural finance aspects of clients' attitudes. The survey has found that
on property, more individuals in the Asian and emerging markets say they
would like to invest more, compared to those in the UK, Germany and Spain.
The survey, done together with the
Economic Intelligence, was conducted between March and April this year.
Sentiment here on property, however, has dampened markedly this year,
alongside a bleaker economic outlook. Roughly 2,300 investors were polled,
with investable assets of between £500,000 and over £pounds;30 million.
On property, 57 per cent of those in
China indicated they want to raise allocations, compared to 48 per cent of
clients in India and 45 per cent of Singaporeans.
Barclays Wealth head of behavioural
finance, says a drop in property prices may not dampen desire by very much.
'Our economic research people tend to feel that perhaps the lower
availability and depth of (alternatives) is one reason for the property
focus in Asia.'
On volatility, he says: 'Data seems to
suggest that Asian investors treat volatility more opportunistically, rather
than cautiously.' This may be partly because investors see the current
downturn as a 'dip' in an upward trend for Asia and the emerging markets.
'In these markets up to last October, the
recent trend has been very strongly positive, and individuals are very
strongly influenced by trends. In mature markets, data extends much further
back and they see this as a cyclical dowturn rather than a dip in an uptrend.'
Another factor that may favour risk
taking is that many in Asia are entrepreneurial, first or second generation
wealth owners. 'Even with the recent and fairly strong drop in Asian
markets, many people are so much wealthier than they have been in recent
memory...This inclines people towards a more opportunistic way of thinking.'
Age appears to play a part in the desire
to allocate to cash. Younger respondents under 50 are more likely to move to
cash in a market upheaval, than those over 50. Younger respondents were also
more likely to trade more frequently. This is likely to reflect the fact
that older investors have more experience of previous cycles and may be less
nervous in the face of volatility.
In terms of monitoring their portfolios,
71 per cent of the individuals monitor their overall portfolio at least
monthly, and 41 per cent monitor either weekly or daily. In the study, Mr
Davies says that the frequency of monitoring a portfolio is linked to an
investor's level of composure. Those with lower levels of composure are
likely to watch their investments more closely.
Those who monitor more tend to focus on
relative benchmarks rather than absolute ones. Individuals' perception of
their own skills, and the extent to which they think their skills contribute
to success instead of luck, also play a part. Wealthy investors who
attribute success to their skills are more likely to monitor and take risks.
The study also looked into clients'
sources of advice. It found that those with assets greater than £30 million
are more likely to seek advice from a business adviser. Those with between
£ 500,000 and £ 1 million in assets, however, look to the media. This
suggests that as individuals gain wealth, they are more likely to rely on
professional advice.
In terms of gender differences, women
tend to be more likely to turn to family and friends, and men seem more
likely to turn to the media. This is partly borne out in the Singapore
portion of the survey, which found that 47 per cent of women cite family and
friends as information sources. Among men, 38 per cent cite their peer
group.
In addition, more than 70 per cent of men
in Singapore believe that increasing the value of their portfolios is the
most important outcome in wealth creation and protection. The majority of
women (65 per cent), on the other hand, see regular income as the most
desirable outcome.
Globally men displayed higher levels of
confidence than women on a broad range of issues, including domestic
equities, tax, bonds and private equities. While the Barclays survey did not
look into performance, academic studies have found that women's portfolios
tend to do better, as they are less likely to trade.
Mr Davies says Barclays is in the process
of fine-tuning a risk profiler for Asian clients. 'We believe that most
assessments that banks use is not good, not behaviourally or statistically
robust, and ask the wrong questions. We'd like to make a distinction between
long-run and short-run financial objectives. We need to understand clients'
composure level, the degree to which they are comfortable with taking risk
in the financial market context.' -
2008 September 3 BUSINESS
TIMES
Asian market fallout set to get far worse
Property, stocks will be hit bad as foreign capital is pulled
Fallout in Asian financial markets and institutions from the sub-prime crisis could
become more serious now as foreign capital, from the US and other leading
markets, is withdrawn, speakers at a symposium in Tokyo predicted yesterday.
Asian property markets - in China and Vietnam especially - are likely to be
hit hard while stock markets could take a battering, along with banks and
other financial institutions, they suggested.
'There may be a sudden shift in capital
flows as a result of fallout from the sub-prime crisis,' warned South
Korea's former commerce minister Duck Koo Chung at the conference organised
by the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) and the North East Asia
Research Foundation (NEAR).
'Coming weeks will be crucial' in this
regard, Mr Chung later told Business Times.
ADBI dean Masahiro Kawai, who told the
conference that 'global financial turmoil may continue longer than hoped
for', suggested to BT that a flight from Asian property market investment by
banks, investment funds and various stock market vehicles could damage these
institutions as the property boom unwinds.
The warnings came as a sobering counter
to the widely held view that Asian markets and institutions are likely to
escape relatively unscathed from the sub-prime credit crunch that has
wrought havoc upon major investment banks and others in the US and Europe.
The theory of a 'decoupling' of Asian economies from outside problems has
similarly been shattered by recent events.
Recent weeks have seen the collapse of a
series of property development firms in Japan as US and other investors
pulled funds from them. The most recent collapse - developer Urban Corp -
marked Japan's biggest corporate bankruptcy this year and the implication of
yesterday's warning at the conference was that firms elsewhere in Asia could
be facing a similar fate.
Mr Chung told BT that property markets in
China and Vietnam are especially vulnerable, while South Korea's property
market is also facing problems along with those of other East Asian
economies. 'There will be another round of credit crisis in developing
economies', as money is 'pulled', he said. Foreign direct investment as well
as portfolio investment in many Asian economies has been directed into
property, added Mr Chung, who is now chairman of NEAR.
The cause of the US dollar's strength in
recent weeks has been partly to do with the repatriation of investment funds
from overseas, and this process could accelerate now as a fresh credit
crunch threatens, in spite of injections of financial liquidity by the US
Federal Reserve, Mr Chung commented. 'This will lead to a further correction
in asset markets' in Asia and elsewhere, he suggested.
'We have been planting the seeds of the
current crisis for many years,' said Mr Chung, who noted that Asia had
supplied much of the financial liquidity that fed asset bubbles in the US
and elsewhere. Now that US credit markets have seized up, the Fed is having
to pump liquidity but this 'can only jeopardise the anchor position of the
dollar' in global financial markets.
Recent Fed actions 'imply an expectation
of continuing stress in financial markets', and meanwhile, economic slowdown
has hit both Japan and Europe, Mr Kawai noted at the conference.
- 2008 August 29 BUSINESS
TIMES

Asian
prime office prices may fall 10%
Asian real estate prices may fall further
and prime office values decline 10 per cent before year's end,
Singapore-based property investor Pacific Star Group said.
'Most markets are peaking over the next
12 months, or even trending downwards,' said Frank Vaessen, president of
fund management at Pacific Star, which manages US$3 billion of assets
globally. 'Broadly speaking, the bottom could come sometime in late 2009 or
early 2010.' Faltering economic growth and the global credit contraction may
ease demand for office and retail space in Asia. Rising inflation and
falling equity markets may also dampen sales of homes in the region.
The price declines will bring valuations
to a more 'normal' level after markets rose rapidly the past year, Mr
Vaessen said yesterday.
Japan and South Korea's office markets
are expected to have the best performance in Asia as they benefit from a
supply shortage, Mr Vaessen said. Both markets are set to offer property
investors returns of as much as 13 per cent over the next five to seven
years, he said.
Retail space in Beijing and Shanghai may
also offer higher investment returns, Mr Vaessen said. Investors should stay
away from Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia, he added, citing Vietnam's
accelerating inflation and volatile currency and political instability in
Thailand and Malaysia. -- 2008
August 7 Bloomberg
Asia
real estate lure
The credit crisis in the United States
has turned out to be an opportunity for the Asian property market, rather
than slowing it down.
Cash flow into Asian property from
outside the region is accelerating, according to a global report published
yesterday.
The Financial Times (FT), quoting data
from the study, said that property investment in Asia grew 27 per cent to
US$121billion (S$165.8 billion) last year, and it continues to grow.
Credit problems and declining real estate prices in the US and Europe have
prompted investors to focus more on Asia, both for long-term returns and
opportunistic investments.
Most Asian markets recorded direct real
estate returns above the global average of 10 per cent last year, FT
reported.
This growth is expected to continue,
according to the report, although at a lower rate.
Still, the outlook in Asia is more
optimistic than that of Europe and North America, where investments slowed
dramatically in the second half, said FT.
The report, published by KPMG, the Asia
Pacific Real Estate Association, and index provider FTSE, came at a time of
aggressive fund-raising activity for new global property funds.
FT said many of these funds are raising
their investment allocations to Asia to tap into economies that are
relatively shielded from the credit crisis in the US.
MGPA, the private equity fund manager
part owned by Australia's Macquarie Bank, for instance, launched a global
fund this week that will invest mostly in Asia. The fund, of which 40 per
cent came from North American investors, has already committed US$2.2
billion to investments in Singapore, Japan, China and Thailand.
- 2008 June 19 ASIA
ONE
Capital
inflow to Asian real estate to climb Asian
market being powered by longer-term investments: report
The ongoing credit crisis in the US and
Europe has put pressure on a decade of sustained growth in global real
estate but the inflow of capital to Asia's real estate market is
accelerating, says a report.
The report - which was released yesterday
by KPMG, the FTSE group and the Asian Public Real Estate Association (Aprea)
- says that Asian real estate is being powered by a combination of
opportunistic and increasingly longer-term investments, coming off the back
of a prolonged period of steady growth. Returns in Asia are projected to
remain higher than the global average for the coming year, according to the
report.
Also, it says that that the slowdown in
the US and European markets is unlikely to cause an immediate negative
impact on Asia in 2008 - although banks will tighten credit policies,
limiting financing options for real estate investments.
'Despite the current tightening of credit
by banks, the deals will continue to happen, but they may take longer, the
price may cost more and lead to a temporary slowing of the supply cycle,'
says Andrew Weir, partner-in-charge of property and infrastructure for KPMG
in China and Asia-Pacific.
However, the current sub-prime fallout
elsewhere may well act as a catalyst for the inevitable further development
of Asia-Pacific as a centre of property and investment management, he adds.
According to the report, total investment
in the region has continued to increase, growing by over 27 per cent in 2007
to reach US$121 billion.
Within the region, Japan remains a
dominant force, not only accounting for half of last year's real estate
transactions but also experiencing the strongest growth. China also grabbed
a number of headlines last year as it continued to produce attractive
returns for investors.
Looking ahead, Japan continues to be
viewed as an attractive market to look into, particularly for the lower-risk
investor, while analysts still view China as a popular place to look at as
large volumes of capital chase more limited investible stock, the report
said.
Real estate funds remain the dominant
source of capital for real estate investments in Asia into 2008, KPMG, FTSE
and Aprea observe.
The proliferation of single-market
high-return funds such as those based on China and Vietnam continue to
service the needs of the short-term speculative investor. But long-term
funds are generally taking a 'wait and see' approach following the dampened
sentiment in US markets, the report said.
It also notes that the potential for new
real estate investment trust (Reit) listings is being affected by the dull
market sentiment. - 2008 June
19 SINGAPORE
BUSINESS TIMES
High-flying
investment bankers moving from US to Asia
Experts
believe that the number of top bankers leaving the US for Asia is set to
increase as a result of the credit squeeze.
As investment banking profits are squeezed
in US and Europe by the credit crunch, institutions are looking to Asia
where many Chinese and Hong Kong firms are flush with cash, having raised
capital by listing shares recently.
Dealogic, which supplies IT solutions to
the banking industry, said the number of acquisitions by private equity in
Asia, not including Japan, increased 15% in the first 3 months of the year
while global deals declined.
Vikram Gandhi, head of Credit Suisse’s
Global Financial Institutions Group, is transferring to Hong Kong to
personally oversee the firm’s corporate finance business in the region.
Mr Gandhi, who will continue to run the
group’s Americas business, is the latest in a long line of dealmakers to
relocate from New York to Hong, these include executives from Blackstone
Group, Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.
Former executive with Deutsche Bank and
Morgan Stanley, Scott Moeller, said investment bankers follow the money
and with sovereign wealth funds having a lot of money and with Asia having
escaped the worst of the credit crunch and with the crunch having hit the
US and Europe the hardest, it is not surprising at all.
Mr Moeller, who is currently a Professor at
the Cass Business School, added once you get critical mass in a location,
it begins to snowball and that is what is happening in Asia.
However, Mr Moeller concluded by saying
London or New York will not be losing their crowns as leading financial
centres any time soon.
- 2008 May 21 FINANCE
MARKETS
World's Highest Apartment Rents
Hong Kong
has the world's priciest apartment rents, with the lease for a three-bedroom
unit costing more than
US$9,700
on average a month, a survey released Wednesday said.
Singapore
, which positions itself as a Southeast Asian business hub, saw Asia's
biggest year-on-year rental increase of more than 30% last year, the survey
by human resources firm ECA International showed.
The survey covered 2007 and is based on
lease prices for a three-bedroom apartment in popular expatriate areas, ECA
International said.
Asian cities, led by
Hong Kong
, accounted for six out of the top 10 locations that have the world's most
expensive rentals for three-bedroom apartments, it said.
Other Asian cities in the top 10 global
list are
Mumbai
which ranked sixth,
Seoul
seventh,
Singapore
ninth, and
Ho Chi Minh City
10th.
Monthly rentals in Asia were on average
US$3,820
, well above the global level of
US$2,950
, said ECA International.
Globally,
Moscow
ranked second, followed by
New York City
,
Tokyo
, and
London
in fifth spot, said ECA International.
"A robust economy and increased
demand for high-end accommodation have been instrumental in driving rental
prices up," said
Lee Quane
, ECA International's general manager in
Hong Kong
.
Hong Kong
apartment rents of
US$9,734
were more than double Asia's average and reflected the geographical
advantage of the Chinese territory for foreign firms wanting to build a base
in the region, ECA said.
"Particularly in the financial
services industry, people are moving into
Hong Kong
so, in spite of its relative high cost, it still remains one of the prime
locations for foreign companies to establish themselves," said Quane.
A three-bedroom apartment in
Singapore
rented for
US$4,460
a month on average last year, compared with
US$3,364
in 2006, ECA said.
"The demand for high-end
accommodation has risen, driving up rental prices, which can be partly
explained by companies expanding their operations in
Singapore
together with government initiatives to attract skilled workers from
overseas," said Quane.
At the same time, a number of factors
limited the supply of property available in the city-state, he said.
Mumbai
, India's financial hub, had the region's second-highest rental rise of 21%.
A three-bedroom apartment there cost
US$5,991 dollars
to lease, ECA said.
For other major Asian cities,
Jakarta
ranked 10th in Asia,
Manila
was 14th,
Bangkok
came in 15th followed by
Kuala Lumpur
in 16th spot.
According to the survey,
Karachi
is the cheapest city in the world to rent a three-bedroom apartment.
ECA says its annual survey of rentals
compares lease prices in 92 global cities. 2008
April 16 AFP
Setting Up in Asia Buoyed
by record economic growth rates
throughout Asia (Singapore and Vietnam expect a final tally of 8 per cent
for 2006 and China is projected at 10 per cent) multinationals are eager to
gain a foothold in the Asian marketplace.
- 2007 March 20 BUSINESS
TIMES
Working towards Asian integration
Some might have thought that Masahiro
Kawai had become 'yesterday's man' after the idea of an Asian Currency Unit
which he proposed last year while heading the Asian Development Bank's
regional integration office was shot down in flames by critics. This
impression may have been reinforced when the ADB announced last November
that Mr Kawai would leave its Manila headquarters and return to Tokyo to
become dean of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) there.
But in fact the former Japanese academic,
who has held senior positions in the World Bank and ADB as well as in
government, is looking more like 'tomorrow's man'. On his shoulders rests
much of the responsibility for getting across the message about the need for
Asian economic integration. It is a task that needs to be approached not
exactly at grass-roots level but among the myriad Asian policymakers who
have the power to make integration happen.
The Japanese government-funded ADBI has
been tasked with carrying out a study into how to provide the physical and
'software' infrastructure needed to knit together a highly diverse group of
Asian nations into a coherent economic community. It has also been given the
job of collating the lessons learned from the Asian financial crisis 10
years ago and forging these into a plan for dealing with future crises - a
major step in regional co-operation.
'This is an enormous challenge, but I
always want to take up a challenge,'' Mr Kawai said during an interview 10
days after he took up his new appointment at the beginning of this month. He
is no stranger to challenges, having faced many before while teaching
economics in the US and Japan, acting as a consultant to the US Federal
Reserve and the International Monetary Fund and serving in government as
well as in multilateral institutions.
Multiple roles
A man who wears his considerable academic
talents lightly, with no hint of arrogance or condescension, the 60-year-old
Kawai-sensei (teacher) is someone who slips easily from the role of
professor to elite financial bureaucrat and public administrator. His
essentially affable nature, ready smile and soft-spoken demeanour belie a
penetrating intellect that is a product of the Tokyo and Stanford University
education that he received in economics and statistics.
We talked in his office at the ADBI's
spacious headquarters in Tokyo's Kasumigaseki government district - a
stone's throw from where Mr Kawai once worked as special research adviser
and then deputy vice finance minister for international affairs at the
Ministry of Finance. Was he happy to be back in Tokyo, where he also worked
as a professor at Tokyo University, and does it make sense for the ADBI to
be located so far away from ADB headquarters in Manila, unlike the World
Bank Institute, which is located within World Bank headquarters in
Washington?
'I don't think it's necessarily a bad
arrangement,' he said. 'When I left Manila I felt a bit sad because Manila
was such a nice place. I enjoyed being in a development institution located
in a developing country. That made a lot of sense. You can get a lot of
insight into development issues on a daily basis.' Relations between the ADB
and ADBI had been 'up and down', he said, but the fact that he and the
previous dean, Peter McCawley, had spent time in both institutions should
help to bridge the gap.
The ADBI, which Mr Kawai will head for at
least the next three years, was founded in 1997 at the time of the Asian
financial crisis. The fact that it is funded by the Japanese government has
given rise to suggestions that it might be introducing a national bias into
regional research projects. But Mr Kawai rejected this. 'Intellectual
independence is key,' he said. 'I do not think the Japanese government would
say intellectual credibility should be bent in the interests of Japan, but
rather that it is in their best interests to see an Asia-based research
institute financed by Japan achieve international credibility and reputable
research.'
What is the difference between the ADB
and the ADBI, apart from physical location and sponsorship? 'The ADB is
operations-oriented but the ADBI focuses on long-term structural issues,' Mr
Kawai said. 'At the ADB you need to be conscious that whatever you do,
whether in research or other types of work, has to be relevant to ADB
operations. Here, what we do needs to be reflected in operations but we can
keep some distance in that we can spend time on important issues for Asia,
that cannot be resolved in a short period of time through policy operations.
'We focus on research and
capacity-building. For research the focus is on long-term, structural
issues, while capacity-building is designed to strengthen capacities and
skills on the part of developing economies. There are four areas of
(interest): poverty reduction; regional cooperation, private sector
development and governance. The issue of regional cooperation and
integration is highly relevant to all of these. Because of my academic
interest in regional cooperation and integration, I would like to focus
particularly on this.
'We will look not only at physical
infrastructure but also the software component of infrastructure - the
surrounding institutional and regulatory environment, governance of
infrastructure corporations, the implication of infrastructure for regional
cooperation and integration, how infrastructure can reduce the costs of
doing business and of international trade. We shall also look at the
financing of infrastructure, how Asia's massive savings can be mobilised to
finance the potential demand for infrastructure in Asia which the ADB
estimates to be US$3 trillion over the next 10 years or US$300 billion a
year.'
Does the new dean feel that Asia is ready
to undertake this kind of ambitious integration of economies by means of
physical and policy linkages? 'Actually there is an increasing demand on the
part of developing member countries for regional cooperation in the area of
infrastructure,' Mr Kawai said. 'The Greater Mekong Sub-Region programme has
been very successful. Initially the ADB had to play a very important role
but once this started to go on there is very strong ownership of the
programme on the part of participating countries.
'Similar programmes are now developing,
such as Bimpeaga - the Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, East Asean
Growth Area (embracing the southern part of the Philippines, Brunei,
Kalimantan in Malaysia, plus Java and Irian Jaya in Indonesia). Also, there
is the ITM - India, Thailand and Malaysia growth triangle - a sub-regional
programme to develop physical infrastructure. In Central Asia there is the
Caric programme. For many landlocked countries in Central Asia, to have
access to markets - to China, India or to Europe, Russia - they need
co-operation, in particular to reach China or Europe.
'The ADBI will identify elements of
successful regional cooperation. We focus not only on the physical aspect
but also on institutional and regulatory aspects, as in the case of roads
connecting one country to another. Different ministries from the respective
countries should come to the table and cooperate to make physical
infrastructure successful.'
Mr Kawai gives the example of a
Vietnamese truck driver driving through Laos and reaching Thailand. Without
mutual recognition of driving licences, border-crossing facilitation, cargo
inspection, customs clearance and emissions standards, such a journey could
be a nightmare.
Is this not a bureaucrat's dream of
co-operation that has little relevance to the real world in which Asian
business operates? No, insists Mr Kawai. 'One of the advantages of
infrastructure development is that it can support a wide array of economic
private sector-driven activities. It can reduce business costs, in
particular trade cost and that is going to be an important component of our
study.' (A recent World Bank study showed that Asia is losing its advantages
to other regions in terms of logistical costs because of inadequate
infrastructure linkages within countries and across borders.)
The issue of what form regional
integration should take in Asia has become something of a political
minefield because different groupings of countries have different ideas.
Does Mr Kawai believe that the ADBI can afford to insert itself into that
debate? 'Well,' he said, 'we will take a look at various initiatives in an
objective way and our view is always that it is good for all Asian countries
to cooperate. At this point, in the case of East Asia at least Asean is
emerging as the hub.
Different groupings
'That is what Japan supports, that is
what China supports and Korea as well as India, Australia and New Zealand
are also supporting. Beyond Asean, (the question is) whether Asean+3 is a
natural group, Asean plus Six or the East Asia Summit is a natural group or
even the wider Apec region. This is something we have to see. Perhaps each
grouping has its own merit and they are complementary. We are not in a
position to promote a particular grouping but we would like to analyse the
pros and cons of different groupings and their strengths and weaknesses.'
Mr Kawai described his role as head of
the ADBI as being to 'find clearly important fundamental structural issues
that Asia is facing and provide the insight into how to approach those
fundamental issues'. In fact, he noted, the ADBI has already carried out
research highly relevant to Asia's needs under his two predecessors. While
dean of the institute, Masaru Yoshitomi did pioneering work on the nature of
financial crises after the Asian crisis, while Peter McCawley shifted the
emphasis to poverty reduction, governance and private sector development.
Now the spotlight has moved to regional
integration, which is in some ways a sensitive area for Mr Kawai. The Asian
Currency Unit or ACU that he proposed while heading up the ADB's Office of
Regional Economic Integration (Orei) was part of a long-term vision that Mr
Kawai shared with ADB president Haruhiko Kuroda for eventually creating a
common currency within Asia. But some US officials saw the move as a threat
to the dollar while European executive directors at the ADB wondered out
loud whether the bank was straying into IMF territory.
Asean+3 finance ministers picked up this
particular 'hot potato' and moved it out of the political arena by asking an
independent research body in Tokyo, the Institute of International Monetary
Affairs headed by former vice finance minister for international affairs
Toyoo Gyohten, to study it. The ADB itself is still involved in the study
and the hope is to present a report to Asean+3 ministers by the time of
their next meeting on the sidelines of the ADB annual meeting in Kyoto in
May, Mr Kawai said.
The ACU initiative - constructing a
'monitored index on a daily basis so that policy makers would understand the
relative movements of individual currencies relative to the Asian currencies
as a whole,' as Mr Kawai put it - was probably ahead of its time. Although
welcomed by some policymakers, it appeared to take others in the region by
surprise, as well as arousing suspicions outside the region. The ADBI's new
dean sees it as part of his job now to help bridge this kind of perception
gap.
'What the ADBI can do is to focus on
long-term issues of how to narrow various types of gap between developed
members of developing member countries and relatively less developed
members,' not just monetary affairs. The ADBI can look at 'how countries can
adopt common standards in different areas such as trade in goods and
services, investment, competition policy and various other types of
regulatory issues. If countries have different regulatory structures it is
difficult for the economies to be integrated.'
Regional integration is not the only
important area of research that Mr Kawai is involved in. He is 'lead
managing' a study being conducted by the ADB on Asia '10 years after the
financial crisis of 1997'. It is a forward-looking study, he said, and is
due for completion in about one year.
'By looking at the lessons of the crisis
and crisis resolution and taking into account new developments since the
crisis, such as China's rise and India's rise and the intensity of regional
co-operation (we can decide) what kind of policy issues are important given
that some sort of economic crisis can take place at any time.'
Another Asian crisis?
He said: 'Hopefully another crisis will
not come but it is always a possibility - and the region has to strengthen
its own capacity to deal with or contain such crises.'
The issue is regarded as being important
enough to involve all of the ADB's various research arms, including the ADBI.
'The first objective is to avoid a crisis and if, unfortunately, there is
one then if countries are strong and resilient enough they may be able to
get over the crisis relatively easily.'
Is this just about building up foreign
exchange reserves in Asia or constructing Chiang Mai Initiative-type
arrangements for swapping those reserves in times of emergency? 'No,' he
said. 'It is much broader, including macro-economic management,
strengthening of financial assistance, development of bond markets;
strengthening the competitiveness of the real sector, productivity
improvement, innovation, and also the social sector.
'At the time of the Asian financial
crisis suddenly the incidence of poverty increased - in Indonesia, Thailand
and other countries. In the case of Indonesia, even though the government
wanted to increase social spending there was no well-defined framework for
such spending. There was no credible system for reaching out to the poor. It
was very difficult - how to help children who had to go out of school and
who had to work. How could we bring them back to school. That process was
very difficult because there was no well structured social-protection
framework.''
What might possibly provoke a crisis in
the future? 'We don't know but what we do know is that (the last one) had
very serious implications for economic activity and the social consequences
were very serious. It is in the best interest of countries to put
macro-economic management right, put the financial system in a strong,
resilient position and to continuously improve productivity and
competitiveness and strengthen social sector provision.'
The 1997 crisis is being used by the ADB
as 'a kind of trigger to address more fundamental issues', Mr Kawai said.
'When I was working for the World Bank
between 1998 and 2001 (as chief economist for East Asia and the Pacific
region) that was in the middle of the Asian financial crisis and its
aftermath. It was a time of crisis response and resolution. In particular, I
focused on crisis-resolution, banking sector and corporate sector
restructuring and the social sector issues. I interacted heavily with
government officials, academics, think tanks of the crisis-affected
countries - Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Korea, to some extent the
Philippines, and also China.'
That was a very useful exercise, Mr Kawai
said - and he intends to replicate it during his tenure as dean of the ADBI.
'One of my objectives is to strengthen
networking ties with other think tanks in Asia and also in Europe and North
America because they also have an interest in Asia. And of course Asean is a
very important player in this context. So I would like to see the ADBI
strengthening its relationship with the Asean Secretariat also.'
We were running out of interview time,
and my tape recorded out of tape. So, I asked him in closing, what is next
for him after the ADBI, where the term as dean runs for three years
(although his two predecessors both stayed on for more than four years).
'I am still a professor,' he responded.
'I am taking leave of absence and then I will go back to my university and
to teaching.' - 2007
February 10 BUSINESS TIMES
Singapore's
listed real estate market is fastest-growing in
the world.
Singapore's Reit market
of US$21.6 billion is only second to Japan, which has a Reit market
capitalisation of US$46 billion.
The third-largest Reit
market is Hong Kong with a market capitalisation of US$8.5 billion, followed
by Taiwan (US$1.7 billion), Malaysia (US$1.6 billion), Thailand (US$1.5
billion) and South Korea (US$0.6 billion).
Investors should be overweight on Chinese and Hong
Kong property plays, as China's efforts to cool the sector are more than
offset by strong long-term growth prospects, an ING Groep fund manager said
yesterday.
But Japanese and Australian property stocks, and
real estate investment trusts (Reits), should be approached with caution,
given rising Australian interest rates and Japan's worsening economic
sentiment, added ING's Justin Pica.
'Probably our strongest story in terms of our
conviction over the medium term is the China real estate story. . .strong
personal income growth, the urbanisation and industrialisation demand, and
also lack of alternative investments,' he told a media briefing in Hong
Kong.
'The government of China implemented specific
cooling measures to clearly control an overheated market. We think those
cooling measures have worked and in general will be positive for the market
over the longer term.'
Mr Pica said that a share price slide by Chinese
developers, by as much as 50 per cent since the end of October, had left
some trading at 30 to 40 per cent discounts to net asset value.
The fund manager, part of a team that manages more
than US$2 billion in Asia Pacific real estate assets, spoke as the Dutch
financial services group launched the ING Asia Pacific Real Estate
Securities Fund in Hong Kong.
ING established the fund internally in September,
investing cash from its insurance operations. Mr Pica said since then it has
outperformed its benchmark, the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Asia Index, by more than
300 basis points.
While the fund is initially being offered to Hong
Kong retail investors and private banking clients in Singapore, ING plans to
roll it out into other markets in Asia. ING officials said they expect the
fund to raise at least US$200-US$300 million within the first six to 12
months.
Mr Pica, the fund's manager, said some of its top
holdings included Hong Kong-listed China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd
and China Resources Land Ltd, as well as Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd and
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.
The Hong Kong-based manager said the fund also
holds Singapore-listed Reits CapitaMall Trust and CapitaCommercial Trust. -
2008 February 26 Reuters
Growth in S-E Asia property market
sustainable: DTZ The property markets of South-east Asia
are expected to sustain the buoyant growth seen in 2007, says DTZ Debenham
Tie Leung.
DTZ said that residential markets in the
region are expected to continue to grow, 'driven by steady economic
expansion, increasing affluence and increasingly attractive projects as
developers strive to refine concepts'.
In Vietnam, DTZ noted that demand for
residential properties, which was already growing fast, was bolstered by the
recent relaxation in rules for housing ownership, allowing foreign land
ownership terms to increase from 50 to 70 years. DTZ said this also
encouraged foreign developers to build residential properties there.
In Malaysia, DTZ said take-up was
encouraging for high-end condominiums in Kuala Lumpur, with a complete
sell-out for several luxury projects. This was supported by the relaxation
of rules for foreigners to buy residential properties and the waiver of real
property gains tax last April. While monthly average gross rents remained
unchanged at RM4 (S$1.25) per square foot, average capital values increased
3 per cent year-on-year to an average RM500 (US$152) psf.
The residential market in Thailand is
also expected to recover, as the political situation improves and developers
are encouraged to launch projects which have been withheld.
In the office sector, DTZ says demand for
office space in Vietnam is expected to continue to be underpinned by limited
potential supply. It said that in Vietnam, most potential supply comprises
non-prime office buildings, 'which will lead to greater competition for
prime office space'. Occupancy remains high, at above 95 per cent, while
Grade A rents average US$3.70 psf per month in Hanoi and US$4.37 psf per
month in Ho Chi Minh City.
The office market in Kuala Lumpur was
also active, with increasing demand by the services, oil and gas,
information technology and financial sectors. Together with limited new
supply, prime office rents rose 7.8 per cent year-on-year to RM62.65
(US$18.16) psm.
Jakarta also saw office occupancy rates
of over 90 per cent. Rents did, however, remain at about US$0.76 psf per
month amid fluctuations in exchange rates.
The Bangkok office market was the only
one that was subdued, with a negative net absorption for H1 2007. DTZ said
this was due to a less favourable operating environment which affected
investors' confidence. - 2008
February 5 BUSINESS
TIMES
Outlook Asia: After a solid '07, what's
next? As 2007 comes to a close, the eyes of the Asian property market are
elsewhere.
With U.S. real estate in a definite slump over the subprime crisis and
prices showing signs of decline in Britain, France, Spain and Italy,
property owners and developers in Asia are wondering if such problems will
appear in their region. They have not so far, and 2007 was a solid year for
residential property in Asia. But only time will tell whether the region has
really "decoupled" from the rest of the world market.
The concerns have left some cautious about prospects. And while 2008
looks set to start strongly in the region, many are hedging their
predictions or are anticipating a slowdown in the second half.
"The impact of subprime on the real estate market is our concern in
the second half of 2008," and the agency is planning to issue an
updated forecast in midyear, said Alva To, the Hong Kong-based head of
consultancy for north Asia for the global real estate consulting company DTZ.
The normally staid property market in Singapore was the top performer in
Asia for 2007. Luxury property values there were up 56.4 percent year over year in the third quarter, according to data from Jones Lang LaSalle real
estate, more than double the pace of increase in Beijing, the second-strongest city, where luxury values rose 25.7 percent.
Singapore's luxury residential performance was driven by strong
underlying investor demand attributed to foreign purchasers, local high net
worth individuals and, during the first half of the year, en bloc
sellers," Glyn Nelson, the Singapore-based head of operations for Asia
real estate intelligence services at Jones Lang LaSalle, explained in an
e-mail.
Investors took a new look at the city, where two casino projects were
under way, and local buyers were heartened by the city's strong financials.
Nelson expects that momentum to continue into 2008, citing Singapore as the
top pick for the year in terms of capital value gains, followed by Shanghai
and Hong Kong.
Tim Murphy, managing director of the real estate investment company
Intellectual Property, is not so heartened about the Lion City, however. He
says the Singaporean government's new measures to cool the market - delaying
plans for public developments and withdrawing plans to let buyers delay home
payments - will cut into results for next year.
"We think there are more profitable places to invest in 2008,"
Murphy said, citing neighboring Malaysia as "a huge success story of
2007." There, the government suspended capital gains tax on property
and is encouraging investment from overseas.
In China, the focus continues to be the government, which still is
tinkering with property regulations to prevent overheating. Many of its
"austerity measures" took effect during the year, with changes in
bank-lending policies making it much harder to get mortgages.
"China slowed down quite significantly," said Buggle Lau, chief
analyst at Midland Realty. Transactions in hot markets like Shenzhen, just
across the border from Hong Kong, were down 20 percent to 30 percent in the
second half of the year, compared to the first half. And values in Shenzhen
fell 10 percent to 15 percent in the last few months of 2007.
The market probably merited some cooling - prices in
Shenzhen, for
example, grew 350 percent in the past three and a half years. And so far,
the government has managed to curb growth without producing a crash. "A
mild correction definitely is good for the long-term development of the
property market in China," Lau said.
Beijing's strong performance for the year is probably explained by an
increase in luxury apartment values and rents before the 2008 Olympics, but
such increases may not last beyond the Games.
In September, the central People's Bank of China and the banking
regulator, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, began requiring anyone
seeking a second home loan to put down a deposit of at least 40 percent of
the property's value and to pay a 10 percent premium on interest.
Edward Cheung, chief executive for mainland China for
DTZ, says the
policy produced a significant drop in the amount of residential property
sold in top-tier markets. In Shanghai, for example, the amount of property
sold in October was less than half that sold in June. "Once buyers have
taken in what the policy actually means, purchasing confidence has usually
returned to the market, and there is no reason why this should not happen
this time around as well," Cheung said.
For once, Hong Kong's property market was pretty stable in 2007. The
overall residential market saw gains of about 17 percent, according to
preliminary figures from Jones Lang LaSalle, having been up 10.3 percent in
2005 and down 0.4 percent in 2006. Luxury values were up an average of 24.5
percent for the year.
Hong Kong did hit the headlines, though, for setting new records in terms
of price. In November, Kerry Properties sold the 7,100-square-foot, or
660-square-meter, penthouse on the 52nd and 53rd floors of its Branksome
Crest development in Mid-Levels for 283 million Hong Kong dollars, or $36.3
million. At 40,000 dollars per square foot, it was a record for an apartment
in Asia.
Based on Hong Kong's very small supply of residential property, market
watchers are predicting a very strong performance. "We have turned
maximum bullish on Hong Kong residential, and expect residential prices to
rise 50 percent by end-2009," the Merrill Lynch research analysts Keith
Yeung, Paul Yau and Kevin Lai wrote in November.
The city's strong fundamentals are the driver, with the economy's rapid
growth producing pay raises for the local work force. "Professionals
have recently regained bargaining power in the labor market," said
Xavier Wong, the head of research for Knight Frank in Hong Kong. "With
the middle-class households keen to upgrade their homes, midpriced units
worth between 4 million dollars and 10 million dollars are expected to do
particularly well."
Property in nearby Macao continues to thrive because of its casino boom.
Prices have jumped about 100 percent since 2003. The city has a dire
shortage of true luxury development, and international developers are
starting to bring higher standards to the market.
Real estate in Japan continues its slow climb out of recession, with the
main drivers continuing to be central Tokyo and Osaka, the largest cities.
Developers are starting to see signs of opportunity in second-tier cities
like Sendai, Fukuoka and Sapporo but they say it is early yet.
Tokyo Midtown, a sprawling project near the trendy Roppongi
neighborhood,
was the highest-profile new entrant. The project, developed by the Mitsui
Fudosan, contains the Park Residences at The Ritz-Carlton, the Tokyo Midtown
Residences and the Oakwood Premier Tokyo Midtown residential buildings, as
well as shops, restaurants, offices, a medical center and museum.
The luxury villa market took a breather in Thailand in 2007, but not
because of subprime problems. The fallout of the 2006 coup that removed
Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra from power had much more effect, and the
uncertainty is expected to continue after the election Sunday in which his
allies won a parliamentary majority.
"2007 has been a year of consolidation for
Phuket," said David Simister, chairman of the brokerage CB Richard Ellis (Thailand). Prices have
shown almost no gain for the year. But, he added, "despite the
country's ongoing issues, prices of new developments in Phuket remain solid
with no discounting."
- 2007 December 28 INTERNATIONAL
HERALD TRIBUNE
Asia as safe haven amid sub-prime debris
Region could benefit as investors reallocate funds from US, Europe
Asia provides a 'safe haven' for property investors as returns decline on US
and European assets because of sub-prime mortgage losses, said commercial
real estate broker Jones Lang LaSalle.
'The region could be a beneficiary of the
fallout as investors reallocate funds from the US and Europe towards
Asia-Pacific in search of higher growth opportunities on a risk-adjusted
basis,' Jane Murray, Asia-Pacific head of research at Jones Lang LaSalle,
said yesterday in a report.
The world's biggest banks and securities
firms wrote down US$45 billion of assets this year and cut 10,000 jobs
because of the collapse of the market for mortgages made to borrowers with
poor credit. Commercial real estate transactions fell in the UK and the US
after defaults on subprime pushed up borrowing costs, creating turmoil in
financial markets.
Global direct real estate investment in
Asia gained 14 per cent to US$54 billion in the first half of the year,
compared with the year-earlier period, Jones Lang LaSalle said. Asian deals
are about a third of the volumes in the Americas or Europe.
'Although regional investment volumes are
still a comparatively low proportion of global direct property investment,
interest levels are very high and we foresee the continuation of rapid
growth in volumes,' said Ms Murray.
Japan remained the dominant market in
Asia for international investors in the first half, accounting for more than
half of investment in the region, the broker said.
Capital values gained 8.7 per cent in
Japan during the quarter to 3.96 million yen (S$52,075) per square metre.
Goldman Sachs Group bought the building
that houses Tiffany & Co's flagship store in Tokyo in August for 37
billion yen, or about 54.45 million yen per square metre, the highest price
paid since the burst of the bubble economy in the early 1990s, according to
Jones Lang LaSalle.
Average monthly rents for grade A office
buildings advanced 3 per cent from the second quarter to 54,882 yen per
tsubo (US$150 per square metre), the 13th-straight quarter of gains, Jones
Lang LaSalle said.
Grade A office buildings are sites with
total leasable floor area of more than 10,000 square metres and more than
800 square metres per floor, according to Jones Lang LaSalle.
The buildings should be no older than 25
years. - 2007 November
14 BLOOMBERG
It's a decade since an asset bubble fed the Asian
economic crisis and fears swirl over the US housing market and interest
rates, but investors still believe the only way for Asia's soaring property
markets is up - at least for a couple of years.
Asian economies are booming, and property is once
again the hot subject of dinner conversations from Tokyo to Mumbai, fuelled
by cheap credit, cross-border investment and rising incomes.
Policy-makers fear a boom-and-bust cycle where
rising real estate prices fuel inflation and force interest rates higher,
leaving households and companies loaded with debt and dragging on economic
activity.
But at the Reuters Real Estate Summit this week in
Singapore, where some residents are seeing their rents jump 50 per cent
overnight, property executives effused about India, despite a doubling in
urban land prices since foreign property investment was ushered in two years
ago.
Japan also appears to be still hugely popular,
although average Tokyo office prices have leapt 25per cent in last two
years.
And investors believe government cooling measures
will bring order to China's market, while failing to stem a hunger for homes
among the expanding and increasingly affluent middle class.
Justin Chiu, executive director of Hong Kong
property giant Cheung Kong (Holdings), said the prospect of ever higher
prices was driving Asia's notoriously sentiment-driven markets. 'If there
are no bubbles, you don't drink beer. It's just plain water and there's no
incentive to invest,' he said. 'Of course, if you see too many bubbles, you
stop pouring.'
Cheung Kong expects mainland China to account for
a third of its property earnings by 2010 from about 18 per cent now.1
The Asian continent saw some US$94 billion of
property investment in 2006, up 43 per cent on the previous year, but barely
one-seventh of the global total. And investors show no sign they will stop
the flow.
New flavours
Morgan Stanley said last week it had earmarked for
60per cent of a new US$8 billion fund for Asia and Goldman Sachs has raised
about the same amount in a couple of funds, according to a source familiar
with the matter.
ING Real Estate is raising two US$1 billion funds
for Asia, and private equity firm Blackstone is raising US$10 billion to
spend globally.
But some market watchers wonder where all the
money will be spent, and if rising values will curb investment returns.
Asian commercial property is tightly held by
families and private companies, so Peter Barge, Asia chief executive of
property consultants Jones Lang LaSalle, believes many investors will have
to take on risky development projects. 'There's a lot of money on the books,
but people are scratching their heads about what to do with it,' Mr Barge
said.
Japan is a perennial favourite in Asia because its
US$1.27 trillion of investment-grade property offers huge choice.
Kurt Roeloffs, Asia head for Deutsche Bank's
property unit RREEF, put it at the top of his list followed by China and
India. RREEF, one of the world's biggest property fund managers, plans to
spend around 30 per cent of its future private equity funds in Asia, Mr
Roeloffs said on Monday. China is drawing Hong Kong developers such as
Cheung Kong as well as funds run by ING Real Estate, AETOS Capital and
Invesco.
But the new flavours of the month are India and
Vietnam, which both rank among the most opaque property markets in the world
but promise internal rates of return of 25-30 per cent.
Forecasts that Indian property prices have surged
too fast and could drop anywhere between 10 and 40 per cent are brushed
aside on the grounds that an outsourcing boom is enriching a middle class
couped up in crumbling homes built decades ago.
'India has huge potential,' said Seek Ngee Huat,
head of the GIC Real Estate. An investment company of the Singapore
government, and one of the world's biggest property investors, GIC is eyeing
developing markets including Russia and Turkey, while cautious about London
offices because of steep price rises.
Mr Barge believes Asia has at least two or three
years more to run on the upward swing of its property cycle, saying: 'Mother
gravity is always there.'
Mr Seek was wary that defaults on US subprime
mortgages could infect the whole financial system.
'There are certainly financial risks being built
up,' he said.
Meanwhile, Liew Mun Leong, chief executive of
South-east Asia's biggest developer, CapitaLand Ltd, which is launching
funds for China and India this year, acknowledged that property investors
may not have the best crystal balls.
'It's funny but we in the property industry can
always predict when the market will turn up, but we can never say when it
will turn down,' he said. -- Reuter
2007 June 28
Japan, S'pore property luring private
equity
Japan and
Singapore's improving returns on property are helping to lure private equity
to Asia as capital flows out of Europe and the US, said Charles McKinley
from Franklin Templeton Investments.
'Private equity players around the world are
actually seeing the Japanese market as being a very fertile ground to have
very high' return on investments, said Mr McKinley, Templeton's global real
estate portfolio manager. 'They are actually experiencing huge capital flows
out of Europe, out of the UK and even out of the US into countries like
Japan, Singapore.'
More than 100 real estate funds may raise a record
US$69 billion this year as investors seek better returns than stocks and
bonds provide, according to Private Equity Intelligence Ltd. Morgan Stanley
raised a record US$8 billion for a real estate investment fund last month,
after announcing in April it was buying All Nippon Airways Co's 13 Japanese
hotels in the country's biggest real estate deal.
Japan's economy is having its longest
expansion since World War II, while Singapore expects its economy to grow as
much as 7 per cent this year, buoyed by financial services and construction.
Foreign investors are buying Singapore
office buildings at a record pace as rents surge after corporate tax cuts
lured investment banks including Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch & Co.
Overseas private equity groups and funds
have spent $2.4 billion to buy office towers this year, 70 per cent of all
such transactions in Singapore, exceeding the $1.9 billion of foreign
acquisitions for the whole of 2006, according to real estate consultant CB
Richard Ellis.
'Frankly, pan-Asia is the most exciting
property region in the globe,' Mr McKinley said . 'Asia is the place to be
for property in the next few years. -
Bloomberg 2007 July 2
Asian property derivatives take root
Property derivatives
are taking root in Hong Kong and Australia and will soon debut in Singapore
and Japan, according to broker GFI, but markets will not prosper until banks
create products to draw retail investors.
Some global investors and developers would relish
having the new products to hedge their positions in Asia's notoriously
volatile markets, Steve Moore, head of Asia property derivatives at GFI,
said yesterday.
But others might find the markets just too risky.
'In Asia, where a market can drop 50 per cent in a
year, or double as it has in Singapore, some people might stay away from
derivatives and others will be tempted in,' Mr Moore said in an interview
during the Reuters Real Estate Summit in Singapore.
'But the market won't take off
until we unlock the retail side, and then we'll see it grow infinitely.'
Following the British market's lead,
Asia's fledgling property derivatives are essentially a two-way bet based on
a property index.
One party agrees to pay a benchmark
interest rate plus a spread after a certain period, while the counterparty
will pay the property returns indicated by the index.
Asia's first property derivatives trade
was unveiled in February - a Hong Kong deal between Dutch bank ABN Amro and
Sun Hung Kai Financial based on a new residential index run by Hong Kong
University.
Mr Moore said that six investment banks
had received licences to be counterparties in property derivatives trades in
Hong Kong, and 'a few are waiting in the wings'.
The next stage in the market's
development would be for retail banks to use property derivatives to package
investment products for 'the man in the street'.
'We get calls from people asking whether
they can hedge their 17th storey apartment in Happy Valley,' Mr Moore said
of a Hong Kong district. 'I have to say come back in three years.'
Advertised as the easiest way to obtain
pure property exposure to a market, property derivatives have been pioneered
in Britain, where the market quadrupled in size to nearly 3.6 billion
(S$11.06 billion) last year.
Mr Moore said that a couple of
over-the-counter deals had been done in Australia, and GFI was working on
three - one on Sydney office exposure, one on residential returns, and one
based on a general Australian property index.
GFI is working with the National
University of Singapore to set up a residential index, and Mr Moore expected
the first derivative deal to be made by the end of 2007.
And in Japan, banks are in discussions to
start up a derivatives market and government collated property data could be
used to form a workable index, he said. 'Japan, maybe along with China, is
the one everyone wants,' Mr Moore said.
Japan's property market has been heating
up for the last three years, with Tokyo office prices jumping 25 per cent
since 2005, thanks to an influx of foreign funds competing with domestic
real estate investment trusts as well as institutional investors.
China is also drawing global names, such
as Deutsche Bank's property investment unit RREEF, ING Real Estate as well
as Invesco.
Property derivatives enable investors to
gain exposure to a property market quickly and with none of the associated
transaction costs such as stamp duty.
They can be used as a hedging tool - by
property firms and investors.
- Reuters
2007 June 28
Asia-Pac home prices roughly in line:
IMF Most
countries not experiencing unusually rapid home price hikes
The rapid run-up in housing prices across the
Asia-Pacific of late may continue for some time yet, but by and large,
prices have not gone grossly out of line with economic fundamentals,
according to an International Monetary Fund (IMF) study.
Housing price data in 12 regional economies does
point to pockets of 'potential concerns', but elsewhere the price rises are
broadly in line with income gains, says a chapter on housing prices in the
IMF regional economic outlook for Asia and the Pacific.
'While housing prices have been rising more
rapidly than inflation, most countries in Asia are not experiencing
unusually rapid housing price hikes,' the report says. 'For the 12 economies
for which data are available, real housing price increases averaged 4.5 per
cent during 2002-06, but the median was substantially lower, at just over 3
per cent.'
Three countries - China, India and New Zealand -
saw real annual price rises of more than 8 per cent over the period, it
notes. And in some cases - Hong Kong, Taiwan and Thailand - recent housing
price increases follow extended periods of declines.
'In such cases, it is plausible that any rise in
housing prices may be a welcome signal for increased investment in the
sector.'
The study also found that housing prices have
outstripped income gains in about half the cases, but have done so to a
significant degree only in Australia and New Zealand.
And housing prices have been relatively tame
compared with other asset prices, the report says, adding that apart from
Australia and New Zealand, annual housing price hikes have been dwarfed by
domestic stock market gains during 1999-2006. 'Of course, this alone does
not prove that housing price gains are not problematic, since many equity
markets have been quite buoyant.'
Across the region, Australia and New Zealand are
the clearest cases where housing price hikes appear large, not just in real
terms but also relative to rents or household incomes, it says. In several
economies - notably China, Hong Kong, India and Korea - localised indicators
point to significant price increases.
Asia's housing markets will likely remain on
policy-makers' radar screens for some time, the IMF says.
'Housing prices have been rising more rapidly than
inflation, and this may continue for some time as regional incomes grow and
financial markets deepen.
'Moreover, as global liquidity remains abundant,
the potential for large run-ups in credit and asset prices to affect overall
inflation or financial or macroeconomic stability cannot be ignored.'
But at the same time, it is important to
distinguish between potentially problematic housing price rises and those
that are more localised or can be explained by real supply and demand
factors, the report adds. - by Anna Teo SINGAPORE
BUSINESS TIMES
2007 April 14
Value in Asia real estate
Asian real estate offers better value
than property stocks because the region's equity markets are still
'vulnerable', said Marc Faber, an investor who predicted the US stock market
crash in 1987.
'I'm optimistic about Asia and emerging
markets, but the stock markets at the present time are still vulnerable,'
said Mr Faber, who oversees US$300 million in assets at Hong Kong-based Marc
Faber Ltd. 'As an asset class, real estate in Asia presents tremendous
opportunities' as 'urbanisation gets underway'.
The Morgan Stanley Capital International
Asia Pacific Index tumbled 3.5 per cent the week ended March 2, the most
since July, sparked by the biggest plunge in Chinese stocks in a decade.
Asia's economic expansion is expected to
drive demand for real estate, attracting interest from investors drawn to
rising rents, Mr Faber said in an interview. East Asian
economies, including China and India, are expected to expand 4.4 per cent
this year, compared with 2.7 per cent in the US and 2 per cent in Europe,
according to the Asian Development Bank.
Rentals for office space in Singapore's
central business district rose to US$644 per square meter (US$60 per square
foot) at end-2006, still lower than the US$692 landlords were fetching in
1996 before the Asian financial crisis, according to Leslie Chua, head of
research at Jones Lang LaSalle in Singapore.
In Hong Kong, rents reached US$1,105 in
2006, lower than the high of US$1,237 in 1994.
Mr Chua estimates rents in Hong Kong will
rise 10 per cent this year, and jump 50 per cent in Singapore. Jones Lang
LaSalle also estimates demand for Singapore office properties outstrips
supply by five times.
'Property is fast becoming an alternative
asset class like gold,' Mr Chua said. 'We do see more upside to property
prices and rents because people are becoming more confident.'
Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing's
Cheung Kong (Holdings) Ltd is among the biggest developers in both cities.
CapitaLand Ltd, South-east Asia's biggest developer, has also expanded its
real estate projects to China and Australia.
To be sure, gains in property prices have
trailed those in stocks. The value of Singapore's office buildings rose 17
per cent in 2006, according to government data, compared with the 65 per
cent gain in the city-state's property stock index. Mr Faber says the
smaller gain offers opportunities for investors.
'If you compare Singapore to an equal
city in the western world, like London, New York, Singapore is not
expensive, it's reasonable,' Mr Faber, the publisher of the Gloom, Boom and
Doom Report, said Monday. 'They are not in a bubble stage like they were in
1996 and 1997.'
China and Vietnam, two of Asia's
fastest-growing economies, are also attractive real estate markets, Mr Faber
said. Vietnam's economy, which expanded 7.4 per cent annually in the past
decade, is expected to grow at least 8 per cent a year in the next 10 years,
according to government forecasts. China's economy, which expanded 10.7 per
cent
in 2006, the fastest since 1995, has
grown an average of 9.2 per cent in the past decade.
In the past month, Citigroup Inc's
property unit raised US$1.29 billion for an Asian real estate-related fund,
and Prudential Plc also plans to invest as much as US$1 billion in the
region's property market. Gome Group, owned by China's richest man Huang
Guangyu, teamed up with Pacific Star real estate group to invest US$800
million in the country's property market.
'Stock markets go through cycles, there's
up and down and this leads to speculation and volatility,' said Pietro
Doran, who manages US$650 million in real estate at Seoul-based Doran
Capital Partners. 'In the long term, for real estate, it's more steady.'
Mr Faber and Mr Doran were speaking at
the Asia Public Real Estate Association forum in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
- Bloomberg
2007 March 14
Global force
China's equity market crash
last Tuesday woke many people up to the Middle Kingdom being an important
rising power not only in a political perspective, but also in the financial
world.
Just stepping into the second day of trading after
the week-long Lunar New Year break, the mainland market plunged nearly 9
percent without any solid reason. It was the sharpest drop in a decade.
What was more shocking was that the impact of the
massive sell-off traveled way beyond Asia to the European markets, then to
the United States, rattling investors' confidence in the world's largest
equity market.
The US benchmark Dow Jones Industrial Average
plummeted as much as 546 points last Tuesday alone - the most since the
first trading day after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
The Dow dived 416.02 points, or 3.29 percent, for
the day, wiping out about US$626 billion (HK$4.88 trillion) in market value.
For the first time in history - to the surprise of
many - when China sneezed, the world including the US market caught
pneumonia.
Many believe the condition will linger on for some
time as global markets have enjoyed a long bull run without any major
adjustments.
A correction for many markets was overdue, but
this is not expected to be the end of the bull market on the back of solid
economic growth supporting decent corporate earnings.
In China's case, its Shanghai Composite Index had
a run-up of 130 percent last year. Even with the plunge last Tuesday, the
market was still up 52 percent from a year ago.
"The US market always has an impact on global
markets, but we have never [before] seen any incident in which the China
market took a toll on the US market," says Credit Suisse (Hong Kong)
head of China research Vincent Chan.
"This is the first time in history that China
[has moved] the US market.
"The mainland shares were not cheap, and a
correction may be due. But a sell-off in the A-share market should not
topple the US shares as the A-shares are traded in a close market, meaning
the liquidity is contained."
Bratin Sanyal, ING Investment Management (Asia
Pacific) head of Asian equity, says China's importance in the world
financial market is the key for the phenomenon.
"China having impact on global markets is not
a surprise," Sanyal says. "China exports to these markets, China
buys from these markets. China has increasing share of the global economy,
and there is the Chinese propensity to acquire foreign assets increases.
China is acquiring more and more US dollar foreign reserves. China clearly
will have an impact on the world.
"This is the first time the China market
moved the world, and this will not be the last."
Not everyone concurs. Frank Gong, chief China
economist at JPMorgan, says even though the predictability of the China
stock market for the economy is expected to improve over time, at this stage
he is cautious about jumping to conclusions on economic growth based on the
performance of stocks in China.
"Blaming the global sell-off on the A-share
tumble is a far-stretched argument.
"The A-share market is a highly inefficient
market, which has not been a good leading or lagging indicator of the
Chinese economy whatsoever," says Gong.
The problem for the global bourses, including
those of Shanghai and Shenzhen, lies with excess liquidity, which has pushed
international markets to vulnerable levels.
The Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors
program of the mainland government, which allows approved foreign
institutions to invest in the A-share market with limited quota, has played
a modest part in the A-share market boom.
The total quota allowed for application by foreign
institutional investors was raised to US$10 billion in 2005. The approved
quota has already reached US$9.945 billion, meaning the total quota is close
to being fully used.
It is estimated that investment under the QFII
program in the A-share market added up to 97.1 billion yuan (HK$97.9
billion), which accounted for a mere 3.88 percent of the combined market
valuation of Shanghai and Shenzhen bourses as at the end of last year.
Foreign funds, however, account for the second
largest segment of institutional investors in the A-share market after local
funds.
Many market watchers believe QFII is unlikely to
be raised anytime soon as the domestic markets remain awash with liquidity.
Meanwhile, liquidity in the global markets seems
to be shrinking as unwinding of carry trades in the wake of rising risk
aversion continues, which is indicated by the rising yen over the past
several days.
Under such a scenario, volatility in global
markets may continue.
Several strategists point out that last week's
global equity sell-off is best seen as a sudden increase in risk aversion,
rather than reflective of troublesome fundamentals.
"The sell-off is best regarded as the result
of a general increase in market risk premia from exceptionally low
levels," says Simon Hayley, senior international economist for London-
based consultancy Capital Economics. Although the rebound in risk premia
looks large by recent standards, their levels remain low by historical
standards, according to Hayley.
"This suggests there is plenty of scope for a
further sell-off as risk premia rise further," he says.
The correction in global markets may continue a
little, but is unlikely to reach the level of sell-offs in May 2006 and
April 2004, say strategists.
Some see the sell-off as a long- overdue
correction, not the harbinger of a prolonged bear market or a new global
downturn.
"While increased risk aversion may still have
some room to go, we think the correction is unlikely to turn into a serious
meltdown," says Citigroup economist Hak Bin Chua.
Increased risk aversion means global investors
will be focusing more on negative news, says Lehman Brothers analyst
Mingchun Sun.
According to Sun, causes for worry include the
recent rise in oil prices, the meltdown in the US sub-prime mortgage market,
recent comments by former US Fed chairman Alan Greenspan that the US economy
could fall into recession later this year, and geopolitical concerns over
Iran.
Although the sell-off may have taken some profits
away from investors' pockets, it was only a mild erosion compared to the
strength of the bull run this past year.
"We see no reason to adjust our economic
forecasts," says Chua. "The current sell-off still leaves markets
significantly higher than a year ago."
Despite the sell-off, ample liquidity is still
floating in markets around the world, and economists see a positive global
economic outlook.
"Asia's growth prospects remain intact,"
says Chua. "Liquidity moreover ample, while concerns over US growth or
inflation are certainly not as deep as in the May sell-off last year."
Emerging markets, especially those in Asia, should
not worry about the threat of capital flight.
"Contained risk of US rate hikes, benign
global economic growth and an improving inflation environment in emerging
Asia should limit the threat of massive capital flight, not just from equity
but also the local currency bond market," says Chua.
Investors should not be too surprised by the sharp
decline in US equities, according to Standard & Poor's chief investment
strategist Sam Stovall.
He says S&P 500 posted positive performances
in each of the last eight months, and it was on the way to recording its
ninth as of Monday evening.
"This string of uninterrupted strength is
less common than investors might think," Stovall explains, adding the
US market, while recently over- bought, continues to retain strong
fundamentals.
"Longer term, S&P's Equity Strategy Group
believes the underpinnings for equity price advances remain." Investors
in Asian equities markets should expect further near-term underperformance,
especially in high- beta markets like Malaysia, according to Standard &
Poor's strategist Lorraine Tan.
"We regard the sell-off as healthy and
anticipate regional markets will stabilize as they are nearing fundamentally
supportable values," she says.
Tan expects more downward consolidation for
A-shares as they remain overvalued.
Stovall says that while the long- anticipated and
much-needed correction appears to be at hand, once the dust settles a
clearer array of buying opportunities may emerge.
"We think it will be a short-term
correction," Sanyal says. "Whatever needs to happen will be
playing out fairly soon. It's not something that's going to last for
months."
Sanyal believes the China markets may fall some
more in the near term. If the correction is too steep, the contagion will
not be contained in Asia - the US, European and Japan markets will all feel
the knock-on effect. - HONG
KONG STANDARD 2007 March 5
Private investors flee stocks to safety of cash
Share investments also supporting their household finances: report
2007 March 1 (LONDON)
-
Private investors took almost £11 billion (S$33 billion) out of
the stock market in the past year, a study showed this week.
Retail investors sold a net £10.9 billion worth of stock in the 12
months to end of January, according to Capita Registrars' 'private investor watch' report.
They also earned close to £6 billion in dividends, with the total £16.9
billion banked by them equating to 650 per British household.
The global market rout the past two days - triggered after China's main
index, the Shanghai Composite, plunged on Tuesday amid fears that the Beijing
authorities would crack down on stockmarket speculation - could lead to another wave of
selling by private investors.
The Capita report showed they are already continuing to leave the stock
market.
Director John Roundhill said: 'We are still seeing net selling and the
amount of buying is in decline too.
'Investors seem nervous of shares at present - perhaps anticipating the
market is close to its peak.' However, Mr Roundhill said there was no evidence to suggest
that private investors are churning their portfolios more than in the past.
He attributed the sell-off to investors redeeming their holdings to
bolster household finances - and retreat to the relatively rosy returns available on cash
deposits.
'The last year has been one of the weakest on record for consumer
borrowing,' he said.
'At the same time, the stock market has been strong, reaching levels not
seen in sixyears, and phenomenal takeover activity has seen a number of private
investor favourites, such as BAA, leave the market.
'It seems investors have been looking to their share investments to
support their household finances.'
He added: 'There may also have been some switch from shares to cash
deposits. Savings rates have risen on the back of the Bank of England's three increases in
base rates; cash investments are more attractive than they have been in several
years.'
The value of private investors' holdings has fallen by just £1.5 billion
to 202 billion over the past year, on account of the stockmarket rally. But they have
cut their share of FTSE 350 companies to 11 per cent from 11.4 per cent 12 months
earlier.
Retail investors were net sellers of shares in every two-month period,
other than August and September when they bought a net £2.6 billion worth of stock. |