Deal
Making

101

 

 

Andrea Eng

VIGNETTES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PACIFIC
beta:

 

Dealing with Asians is no cakewalk


Issue:
Cultural Differences:
ASIAN  NORTH AMERICAN
  • Subtle
  • Relationship-oriented, respect elders
  • Vertical and horizontal integration
  • Adaptable and flexible
  • Direct
  • Transaction oriented  
  • Horizontal vision  
  • Bureaucratic  
DEALMAKING 101                    by ANDREA ENG   

Think you know China? Eight things foreigners get wrong

SHANGHAI, China - As a public service, here’s a thoroughly idiosyncratic, non-comprehensive list of the eight most common misunderstandings about China.

1. China is America in the 1950s (or Japan in the ‘80s, or Mexico in the ‘90s or ...).

Everybody loves a good historic analogy, but China is too big, too complex and too thoroughly integrated with the rest of the world. The country’s consumer culture is leapfrogging its own unique path.

2. China’s public data are unreliable.

There have been tremendous strides recently in the quality of publicly available data, especially for urban demographics. Pay attention to the development plans of central and city governments. They are clear and ambitious, if vague at times. I also recommend a visit to the Shanghai Museum of Urban Planning to anyone curious about population density, retail clusters or transportation infrastructure.

3. China’s Internet is like the rest of the world.

As Google’s recent drama has highlighted, China’s Internet is unique. Global big guys like eBay, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Skype and, yes, Google are insignificant or non-existent here.

Want to utilize social networks for your brand? Spend a day learning QQ and mastering its roster of functions not seen in the West. I have a soft spot for Douban, which acts as a sort of user-generated index to the global library of music and film. (QQ is a popular free instant messaging computer program in Mainland China with more than 300 million users; Douban is a web2.0 startup founded by Bo Yang to help users to tag, share, rate, review and discover books, movies and music.)

Empowered by Douban, culturally inclined youth are uncovering everything from punk classics to experimental Dutch cinema, and sharing them with their friends.

4. China’s consumers are split between urban and rural.

Technically true. But most global brands are actually dealing with a limited part of China: the mega-urban and the merely urban. China’s consumer market is overwhelmingly clustered in cities—many with populations of one million or more.

Size isn’t everything. The most relevant factor for marketers should be the city’s access to a cultural center like Beijing or Chengdu. A mom living in a medium-size city two hours from Guangzhou is likely to be more sophisticated about brands than her counterpart living in the massively populated, but under-exposed, provincial capital city Zhengzhou.

5. China’s regional differences are as big as Europe’s.

I hear this one from very sophisticated people, keen to show their respect for the scale and scope of China. Their hearts are in the right place, but they overstate the case. There are certainly regional differences, but within a moderate range. All of China learns the same history, takes the same exams, speaks the same language (at school at least) and watches the same news programs. Climate is one big exception, and it does influence food, architecture and even clothing.

6. There are big generation gaps between each decade.

Generation gaps are huge, and they crop up more than every decade. This is a logical result of fast economic growth. Changes in culture and technology result in wildly different formative environments.

Today’s 25-year-olds grew up watching glossy boy bands like Taiwan’s F4. Meanwhile, kids a mere five years younger watched gender-bending Li Yuchun (from “Super Girl”) and other courageous oddities of the reality TV circuit. Is it any wonder they embrace a weirdness that baffles their elders?

7. China is rapidly Westernizing.

Without a doubt China is modernizing—just look at all the KFCs. But can we call it Westernizing if those KFCs sell congee for breakfast?

While there is a notable increase in Western brands and lifestyle options, it is matched by a comparable increase in historic Chinese culture. Witness the renewed interest in pu’er tea collecting, learning calligraphy and the resurrection of Imperial dishes.

There is a strong argument that China is becoming more Chinese. There’s one other often-overlooked influence: North Asia. Japan, the world’s second biggest economy, sits off China’s shore, and its cultural influence is at least as significant as that of the West. Sure, 18-year-olds in urban China are wearing American Nike shoes. But 15-year-old kids are reading Japanese manga and listening to Korean pop.

8. Chinese youth are divided into tribes.

There is a kernel of truth here, and young people are segmenting themselves at ever-earlier ages. But these tribes look different from their Western counterparts. In the West, we can use magazine, music or brand affiliations as shorthand to describe a group. These don’t quite work in China, what with print media being relatively small and the music scene so confused by piracy.

Brand preference can be descriptive in big cities, but in the rest of the country brand differentiation is more blurred. So what does that leave? Celebrity preference can be useful. Choice of hobbies, including membership in online clubs, says a lot about a person. But there is a lot of fluidity and change.    - 2010 February 3  By P.T. Black, Crain News Service  
 
P.T. Black is a partner at Jigsaw International Ltd., a boutique lifestyle research agency in Shanghai that looks at the direction of change in China, particularly among young adults. This piece appeared in Advertising Age, a New York-based sister publication of Tire Business.

China lacks talented managers and leaders
But there's hope for the long term as the successful ones rise and replicate

In 2006 alone, China-focused venture capital and private equity funds raised close to US$20 billion from investors around the world. This figure does not even include global private equity and hedge funds such as Blackstone, in which the Chinese government has taken a stake and which undoubtedly will invest in Chinese companies.

Indeed, US$20 billion is a startling number for a country where the conventional forms of corporate finance - public equity, bank debt and bonds - are woefully underdeveloped. The term 'venture capital' barely had an adequate Chinese translation 10 years ago - 'private equity' still does not have one to this day.

This anachronism - one of many in China - manifests itself in unexpected ways. One of them is the significant shortage of management talent and leadership relative to capital. Although it is difficult to get a bunch of venture capitalists to agree on anything, they all lament that 'in China there are a ton of business opportunities' and 'too much money', yet 'not enough fundable people'.

Along similar lines, according to a recent survey by Accenture, most multinationals in China count recruiting and retaining good people as their biggest obstacle to growth. Lack of management skills, trustworthiness and the ability to scale are often cited. It is ironic that, in a country of 1.3 billion, the people factor has become the limiting factor.

To understand this mystery, one needs to keep in mind that while these days Shanghai is a lot more interesting and exciting in which to do business than New York City (just ask anyone who has worked in both), capitalism in China is at best 20 years old and still very much in its infancy.

Most Chinese people in their forties and fifties, whose counterparts form the backbone of business management in the West, had their education interrupted by the Cultural Revolution and afterwards worked most of their lives in state-owned companies, where they held 'iron rice bowls' and did as little as they could.

It was not too long ago that I had to beg an attendant at the Shanghai Number 2 Electronics Store to show me products safely ensconced in a cabinet behind the counter, or with humble apologies ask waiters to pause their chatting and bring me a menu.

My sister, who is in her mid-thirties today, is one of the lucky few who had the opportunity to be trained in Western management skills after she graduated from college in 1992. In her case, it was with Hewlett Packard, one of the earliest joint ventures established by Western companies in China.

While Chinese capitalism has resulted in many individual contributors and some good managers like my sister, its short tenure has created very few experienced executives.

Aside from the skills and experience factors, another issue is the use of standard business practices and ethics. As aptly described in a plethora of China business books, more often than not, the signing of a contract is the beginning rather than the end of negotiation; conflicts of interest and insider trades are opportunities to take advantage of rather than challenges to manage; and minority investor interest is quite literally a foreign concept.

Its eventual collapse notwithstanding, Enron would be considered a paragon of good corporate governance compared to many of the Chinese companies listed domestically and abroad. Again, this should hardly be surprising.

Coming from the modern business world, a Western businessperson tends to forget that things were not always so orderly. The robber barons got their names for a reason. Imagine the blank stares - or worse - one would get if he or she started to mouth off about Sarbanes-Oxley in front of the business pioneers of the Western world.

Yet if one examines the drivers behind the people factor, it gives one pause in the short term but hope for the long run. It is clear that many of the management and leadership issues are a result of China's unique history and environment, and unlikely to have quick fixes.

A Western investment firm, wild-eyed over China's admittedly exciting business opportunities but unaware of the people factor, is in for a rude shock - hopefully before it puts most of its money to work.

Over the long run, just as has happened in the West over the past century, institutions, laws and enforcement mechanisms will be put in place to provide incentives for proper business practices. They are good for everyone because they promote fair, more importantly efficient, and ultimately more sustainable, growth - a goal that the Chinese government has finally firmly set its eye on.

One can also hope that the many Chinese managers in their twenties and thirties today will grow to become leaders tomorrow. So far, Western companies and investors have provided most of the training but, increasingly, the growing tip of the iceberg - successful Chinese executives and entrepreneurs in China and abroad - have begun to set examples and invest both their time and financial resources in teaching and fostering leadership.

One can imagine a future where inexpensive products will no longer be the only Chinese exports, but Chinese leaders will become teachers and investors in other parts of the world. - by Bo Shao  SINGAPORE BUSINESS TIMES  17 August 2007      The writer is the chairman of Novamed Pharmaceuticals, China, and the Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum

MORE ANECTDOTES:

Dealing With Planning Ignorance

Liu Thai-Ker started his friendship with China in the early 1980s when he was tasked to help the Fuzhou government with the master planning of the city. This was followed by a similar request from Xiamen. Since then, he has helped to chart 'many, many' master plans

Although a number of the master plans were not implemented owing to various reasons, ranging from change in political leadership to a lack of local talent, Mr Liu says that he takes comfort that some ideas were adopted.

'If I can recognise 15 per cent of the land use in my plan, I give the city full marks. I wish they can raise it to 70 per cent, but this is the reality. The issue is that if they get 30 per cent or 15 per cent, isn't that better than zero? Or even minus? If they go on the wrong track, it'll be worse, isn't it? So this is the way I console myself. But I'm hopeful that more and more cities in China will respect the integrity of the master plan.'

He also notes that while there is heightened awareness about environmental issues, developers and local authorities are having a tough time balancing green practices with the pursuit of economic growth. The answer, he says, lies in preparing a thoughtful long-term plan. But not every city government understands that.

'Also, I think one of the reasons Chinese cities or even other Asian cities don't develop well is that they are more architecture-oriented than planning-oriented. If you want to produce a sensational piece of architecture, very easy. Just pay to get a famous architect to do it.

'But it's just a building. It will not change your city. So there are many cities, officials are so seduced by sensational architecture that they think that's a solution to improve their cities, which is wrong. Because sensational architecture, individual pieces, they are like jewellery on a person's dress. The jewellery, no matter how beautiful it is, if it sits on a sick person's body . . . then the jewellery sooner or later will lose its shine anyway. They still don't yet quite understand the relationship between planning and architecture. But this problem is not unique to China. Even Singapore, we also have a tendency to think that good architecture can replace good planning, which is totally false.'  - 2010 November 13   SINGAPORE BUSINESS TIMES

Doing business in China not so easy.  

It is now widely recognised that success in China is predicated upon a cultural understanding of the way business is done in one of the world's fastest-growing economies. "Guanxi" or relationships are critical to this.   Many are hoping that the 'seasoned China hands' they have hired will give them this edge and thus a competitive advantage in sourcing and closing deals.    

China saps Maple Town of Canadian style
A new suburb's look was meant to evoke Canada's spirit, but the grind of local politics crushed most concepts away

FENGJING, CHINA -- It was touted as the first Canadian town to be built in China. There were breathless reports that "Canadian Maple Town" would feature a slice of the Rocky Mountains, a replica of the Northern Lights, eco-friendly Canadian technology and even a depiction of the RCMP Musical Ride.

Today the dream has crashed into the reality of Chinese capitalism. A handful of shrunken maples are about all that survives of the much-vaunted scheme to build a Canadian suburb in the heartland of China.

Almost every trace of Canada has been wiped out of the blueprint. Instead the developers are talking vaguely about a "North American flavour" for the planned suburb of 25,000 residents. Their models show palm trees where the maples were once envisioned.

"We've had to make some changes," acknowledges Zhang Fushun, chairman of the development company at Fengjing, about 60 kilometres southwest of Shanghai. "The overall concept is for a North American flavour, but people understand that this includes the United States too."

The sad fate of Maple Town is a cautionary tale for Canadian architects who venture into Chinese territory. Early enthusiasm for Canadian designs can be quickly sabotaged by profit-hungry Chinese developers, who prefer the familiar habits of cheap construction and faux-foreign design.

Three years after winning a competition to design the project, Toronto architect Lisa Bate puzzles over photos of the site.

She scarcely recognizes a massive neo-classical bridge at the suburb's centre. Her team had planned an eco-friendly bridge of light materials, with room for trees, bicycle lanes and pedestrian paths. Now it is dominated by heavy Roman columns and ornaments, all built from concrete, and the developers have decided to call it the Alexander Bridge, though nobody seems to know why.

"It was supposed to be a suspension bridge, very elegant, with minimal use of materials," Ms. Bate said. "But they said it was too expensive. So, once again, they used massive amounts of concrete. They reinterpreted it into their own vision."

The developer, Mr. Zhang, is unperturbed when a visitor tells him that the bridge is not very Canadian in appearance. "That's because Canada doesn't have its own culture -- it's just a mixture of French and British," he explains airily.

Maple Town was born at the turn of the millennium when Shanghai decided to build nine satellite towns on its outskirts. Each would take its theme from a foreign country: Britain, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Nordic countries -- and Canada.

Six years later, some of the projects are progressing rapidly. Thames Town is quaint, with cobbled streets, a fish-and-chips shop, a pub, a church, a village green, a market square surrounded by Georgian townhouses and even a statue of Winston Churchill.

New German Town is situated near a Volkswagen plant and a Formula One track, with homes modelled on the German city of Weimar. Italian Town has canals inspired by Venice.

But little has happened at Maple Town, except a gradual drift away from the original ideas. Only a few Canadian maple trees have been planted, because they grow too slowly. Instead the developers are growing hundreds of maples from Japan and the United States, which grow much taller in the Chinese climate. Palm trees have been added to the display models.

As for the replicas of the Rocky Mountains and the RCMP Musical Ride, the developers are baffled by the question. Those ideas were dropped so long ago that they cannot even recall them.

"We will use a Chinese approach to interpret the Canadian style," explains Wang Hui, planning director at the Fengjing development company.

An early intention to put Canadian cedar and other materials into the suburb has also been largely abandoned. A sales brochure talked of including "Inuit paintings and Indian wood sculptures" along with statues of Emily Carr and the Group of Seven, but the developers were unable to explain what had become of those ideas. In fact, the entire Canadian theme has become so murky that it is almost impossible to pin down.

"We might not be importing Canadian building materials or architectural styles, but we hope it will embody the spirit of Canada," Mr. Zhang says vaguely.

To make matters worse, Maple Town has fallen far behind the pace of the others. Its developers have spent $100-million (U.S.) on roads and infrastructure, but that represents only one-fifth of the planned budget. None of the housing has been built, except for apartments for the 3,000 residents who will be relocated to make room for the suburb.

"Things have gone sideways," said Ms. Bate, president of Six Degrees Architecture and Design Inc., based in Toronto. "We wanted to promote a Canadian sensibility: clean air, clean water, nature, sustainability. You work your butt off, you work around the clock and then the vision is not carried out."

Her original plan for Maple Town included a Canadian state-of-the-art system of catch basins to remove sediments and oil from the canals. But she soon discovered that her plan had been ignored. "They'd already put in the same old crappy catch basins that they always use," she said.

"As an international firm, we can do the master plan and the design development, but the working drawings have to be done by design institutes, which are owned by governments. They go back to construction practices that they know."

In an earlier China project, Ms. Bate designed a sustainable building, including wind turbines and recycled water, as an eco-friendly gateway to a resort area in Jiangxi province. That design, too, was dumped. "Now it looks like the Palace in Monaco on steroids," she said.

Her firm has scrapped a plan to open a branch office in China. "It's been very frustrating. . . . The central government wants international competitions, sustainable design and energy efficiency. But after you win a competition, you get dumped by the local governments.   They hire the same old guys and it ends up with no relation to the original plan." - THE GLOBE & MAIL    2007 Jan 10

Accelerating Asian opportunities for B.C. Deal-making guide through complexities of Chinese investment world

The Chinese are coming. They’re going to continue to come, and experts say local businesses need to know how to cut deals with them if they’re to realize the huge Asian opportunity the Chinese present.

“The Canadian business community and also the public, the media, even the government have to face this reality or new trend that is likely more Chinese investment coming to Canada,” said Kenny Zhang, a research analyst with the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada.

Over the past several years, China’s juggernaut economy has generated numerous deals for Canadian companies, many of which are Vancouver-based resource enterprises.

Joyce Lee, a partner in McCarthy Tetrault’s business law group, is a go-between for Chinese and Canadian companies looking to negotiate deals.

Last year, Lee played a role in six deals between resource companies worth more than $1.3 billion and has worked with Wuhan Iron & Steel (Group) Corp., the Hanlong Group and state-owned China Investment Corp. (CIC).

While it’s no secret that China’s hunger for natural resources appears insatiable, Lee said Canadian companies have been slow to realize that.

“The long and short of it,” Lee said, “is the Canadian companies have been reluctant to deal with Chinese companies, because they’re not very used to dealing with Chinese investors.”

She added that there are two reasons why Canadian companies have been reluctant to catch on.

The first is that prior to the recession, the commodities market was so strong Canadian companies had little reason to venture abroad.

The second reason goes back to 2005 when China Minmetals Corp. made a bid for Canadian copper and nickel producer Noranda Inc.

The deal fell through, and Switzerland’s Xstrata plc bought a stake in the company.

“I think it’s fair to say they [Chinese investors] were not as prepared as today,” Lee said, “and they were not very used to dealing with transactions the so-called ‘western way.’”

Chinese investors consequently turned their attention to Australia and in Canada focused on smaller resource deals. But that approach didn’t last long.

In 2007, Chinalco, China’s largest diversified miner, bought Peru Copper Inc. for US$860 million.

Last year, CIC took a $1.74 billion stake in Vancouver’s Teck Resources Ltd. (TSX:TCK.A/TCK.B).

Lee said Canadians and Chinese have figured out how to do business together, and it’s unlikely the rate of deals will ebb any time soon.

She said the Chinese are involved in three types of deals with Canadian companies:

  • takeovers;
  • substantial investments short of majority shareholder positions; and
  • joint ventures in which Chinese companies sign off-take agreements for specific commodities.

  • Apart from the mines, they’re also very interested in seeing how successful North American mining companies actually conduct mine development and mining business,” Lee said.

Chinese companies have ambitions to become world-class players in the mining sector, she said, and that’s another reason they’re entering the Canadian resource scene.

    The trick, she explained, is for Canadian companies to figure out how deals with Chinese investors differ from others.

    “One of the keys would be to get the two parties to understand each other.”

     

    On paper, the deals don’t look much different from any other merger or acquisition, she said, but certain social and business customs must be met.  Lee pointed out that meetings and interactions are critical to bridging cultural gaps.

     

    “From a deal management perspective, I try to make sure some of the critical issues get dealt with from Day 1 so there’s no frustration.”

     

    That means establishing what a deal’s timeline is and who its decision makers are.

     

    “You have to understand for big state-owned companies you don’t get to see their chairman,” said Lee. “It’s a big corporation, and therefore there are many departments within them, and each department might have a slightly different objective.”

     

    She added that every company is different, and figuring out who makes the ultimate decision on a deal comes with experience.

     

    Canadian businesses should also be aware that Chinese companies sometimes work from consensus, so there might not be a single decision maker.  But Lee said the Chinese aren’t only after minerals.

    “Technology would be another area that we’ll see some action,” she said, noting that Chinese investment adds a huge Asian market for tech companies.

     

    In that case, B.C. technology firms need to make sure their intellectual property is well protected if it’s going to be used overseas.

     

    The Asia Pacific Foundation’s Zhang said the Chinese are also interested in B.C.-based biotechnology and bio-chemical companies.

    “It’s not only one particular sector that’s benefiting,” said Zhang. “It’s the whole economy.”

    And thanks to immigration, said Lee, Vancouver has a leg up on the rest of Canada when it comes to forging deals with Chinese investors.

    “They’re more familiar with Vancouver. Undoubtedly, the key principals of these either state-owned companies or private companies would have friends and relatives living in Vancouver.”    - 2010

     

 


Copyright ©  2011
By opening this page you accept our
Privacy and Terms & Conditions