
Private-equity firm Tribeca Cos. took
ownership of a block of apartment buildings in the San Francisco Bay
area by buying up defaulted mortgage debt on the cheap, in the latest
sign of how investors are maneuvering to pick up distressed commercial
real estate.

Tribeca used a "loan-to-own"
strategy that is becoming increasingly popular among vulture investors. The
San Francisco firm first bought $62 million of nonperforming mortgages for
50 cents on the dollar from the buildings' lender, UBS AG. Tribeca moved
Wednesday to foreclose on the properties, including nine buildings in San
Francisco and one in Burlingame.
The buildings were previously owned by
closely held Lembi Group, which had been San Francisco's largest landlord.
The company defaulted on about $300 million of loans in 2008 and handed over
50 buildings securing those loans to UBS, its largest lender, including the
10 apartment properties Tribeca took over Wednesday. Over the past year, the
Swiss bank has sold down to about $150 million the portfolio of Lembi
properties it took back, a person familiar with the matter said. A UBS
spokesman declined to comment. That portfolio doesn't include the 10
apartment properties Tribeca took over Wednesday.
Lembi's woes are another example of how
debt-fueled real-estate acquisitions are now coming back to haunt landlords
and other property investors. Between 2003 and 2007, Lembi became San
Francisco's dominant residential landlord by spending more than $1 billion
and borrowing up to 95% of a building's purchase price. The company
accumulated a portfolio of 307 buildings and more than 8,000 apartments
across the city.
By buying the nonperforming mortgages on
the Lembi properties, Tribeca used the debt positions to angle for
ownership. Such strategies have been around for years and are expected to
pick up further as more landlords are struggling with rising vacancies,
falling rents and heavy debt loads.
- 2009 December 31 WALL
ST. JOURNAL
TRANSACTION Rutherford
Investments has sold three small 1960s-era developments in the region
totaling 167 units to Landmark Realty, according to the broker,
Atlanta-based Apartment Realty Advisors. The combined purchase price was
$26.2 million. The individual cap rates, based on in-place income, range
from 5.4% to 6.2%, according to ARA.
Both Rutherford and Landmark are based in San Francisco. Rutherford is a
syndicator with a $1-billion portfolio that has been slowly selling smaller
properties and trading up. Landmark owns a few hundred units in San
Francisco proper and was looking to reinvest proceeds from a refinancing of
his San Francisco properties.
The properties are Marine View Apartments and Shoreline Apartments, both
located in Alameda, CA, and Romar Apartments located in Novato, CA. Alameda
is located directly across the bay from San Francisco. Novato is located 25
miles north of San Francisco.
Shoreline Apartments, 38 units, sold for $7.4 million or $194,736 per unit.
Built in 1961, the property is situated across the street from the San
Francisco Bay. The property sold for a 5.4% cap rate on in-place income, the
lowest of the group due primarily to its bay views and proximity to the
beach.
Marine View Apartments, 65 units, sold for $9.65 million or $148,462 per
unit. Built in 1967, it includes studios, one, two and three bedroom floor
plans with an average unit size of 778 square feet. The property sold for a
6.1% cap rate on in-place income, according to ARA.
Romar Apartments, located just west of Highway 101, sold for $9,175,000 or
$158,190 per unit. Romar was built in two phases, with 42 units completed in
1962 and the additional 12 units added in 1980. All units in this asset have
two-bed, two-bath floor plans offering 750 square feet of living space. This
property sold for a 6.2% cap rate on in-place income.
The transactions are the first apartment sales in the region since last
year. Landmark is expected to close one more small property from Rutherford
in the coming weeks when the loan assumption is approved. The brokers
involved were John Downing and Craig Chiappone. Chiappone tells GlobeSt.com
that the buyer put the properties under contract late last year and that cap
rates have since moved up slightly.
“We had eight or nine offers from institutions when the properties first
came to market in July but those all fizzled out,” he says. “We
remarketed the properties in November and found this buyer in December. I
don’t know if we could replicate [the cap rates] if they came to market
today but we could get pretty close to it.”
- 2009 March 2009 BUSINESS
JOURNAL
Rents show signs
of rising
In San Francisco, rents are up slightly. Below, changes in average rents
for all types of apartments in the nine counties:
County |
2Q 2004 |
2Q 2003 |
% change |
Alameda |
$1,197 |
$1,220 |
-1.9 % |
Contra Costa |
$1,146 |
$1,152 |
-0.5 % |
Marin |
$1,485 |
$1,525 |
-2.6 % |
Napa |
$1,069 |
$1,051 |
1.7 % |
San Francisco |
$1,786 |
$1,762 |
1.4 % |
San Mateo |
$1,378 |
$1,406 |
-2.0 % |
Santa Clara |
$1,271 |
$1,307 |
-2.8 % |
Solano |
$1,062 |
$1,063 |
0 |
Sonoma |
$1,084 |
$1,084 |
0 |
Bay Area |
$1,274 |
$1,294 |
-1.5 % |
Buck up, renters. After almost four years of falling
rents, it looks like the cost of leasing an apartment in the Bay Area could
get more expensive.
Don't panic yet. Rents are still dropping in many
parts of the Bay Area -- but the decline has slowed. Meanwhile, San
Francisco landlords have been charging more, and almost 95 percent of the
apartments in San Jose are booked, according to the latest rental survey.
"Last year, I was giving rent rebates to even existing tenants,"
said Gregg Witkoski, who owns three different San Francisco buildings.
"But that's long gone now."
The average rent for a one-bedroom apartment in
San Francisco rose 2.9 percent year-over-year, to $1,652 per month, said
Novato rental research firm RealFacts. For all apartment types in the city,
the average rose 1.4 percent from 2003, to $1,786 - the largest increase in
four years. The last time the city's average rent ticked up was in the third
quarter of 2003, when it edged up $7, or less than one half of 1 percent, to
$1,769.
Although the overall average monthly rent in San
Jose dipped 2.8 percent to $1,271 for the three months ended June 30, the
city's occupancy level - which plummeted after the dot-com bust -- jumped
1.4 percent to 94.5 percent, the first year-to-year increase in four years.
The slightly more competitive Bay Area market reflects a trend across many
of the 25 metropolitan areas RealFacts surveyed in its quarterly report.
"Across the West, occupancy rates are up, which
suggests that they're preparing for (rent) increases," said William
Ktsanes, director of research at RealFacts.
A 95 percent occupancy rate is considered key in
the residential rental market. At that level or above landlords can raise
rents; below 95 percent usually means rent decreases in an effort to fill
vacant units.
At the same time, however, Ktsanes stopped short
of describing the second quarter data as a clear shift to a landlords'
market in the Bay Area, partly because in some areas, additional housing is
still becoming available. That increased housing stock, paired with low
interest rates -- which are pushing a flood of renters to become buyers --
could keep a lid on rent prices for the next few quarters.
"Because of the low interest rates, there's
been lots of construction occurring," said Ktsanes, noting that several
large developments are under way in Silicon Valley.
RealFacts' Bay Area reports are based on surveys
of about 1,200 so-called Class A apartment complexes containing 50 or more
units. In Sacramento, the minimum is 75 units; in all other cities, the
cutoff is 100 units.
Although the firm's surveys do not include smaller
apartment buildings -- which are common in much of the Bay Area -- local
landlords say vacancies are down, and prices are firmer.
Of the 15 units he owns, Witkoski has only one
vacancy, compared with last year when each of the five units in his Haight
Street building turned over.
"I spent more time renovating those
apartments than" working at his SoMa art framing business, Witkoski
said.
In addition, popular Web sites where many local
owners advertise their units show fewer rent discounts.
For example, only about two dozen current postings
pop up on Craigslist.com with the word "reduction" in the ad,
compared with hundreds of such ads last year and in the months immediately
following the crash of the high-tech bubble in 2000.
On the other hand, some experts say supply still
outstrips demand.
Market research at MetroRent, a San Francisco firm
that pairs landlords with tenants, shows stagnating rents. And the two
factors that would boost rents -- job creation and higher interest rates --
aren't materializing, said John McWeeny, the company's chief operating
officer.
"We're at an equilibrium, and I think we will
be for the next year," McWeeny said.
Indeed, in several Bay Area counties, occupancy
rates remained below 94 percent, and average rents were down year-over-year,
though in some cases, by only a few dollars per month. As recently last
summer, the average rent fell year-over-year by 6.2 percent for the Bay Area
and by about 9 percent in Santa Clara County. The steepest declines in the
region were from 2001 to 2002.
For some prospective tenants shopping in San
Francisco, there seems to be wide selection and little competitive pressure.
Theodore Ordon-Yaussi, a San Francisco State
student who currently lives in the Sunset District, has toured more than a
dozen units throughout the city in recent days. On Thursday, the 19-year-old
and his mother, Irene Ordon, looked at a one-bedroom loft in the Richmond
area listed for $1,300 per month.
"There's definitely a lot of choice. ... And
it feels like (rents) are negotiable," said Irene Ordon.
Nevertheless, others in the market say there are
few, if any, breaks on rent. In the last two years, many landlords
advertised free rent for a month or two, reduced security deposits and made
allowances for pets -- perks unheard of during the high-tech frenzy when
occupancy neared 100 percent.
"There may be some people offering maybe a
smaller security deposit, but there's no free rent for a month or
anything," said Academy of Art student Brett Magnuson, 25, who viewed a
two-bedroom, $1,600 unit owned by Witkoski in the SoMa section of San
Francisco.
What's more, Magnuson, a native Nebraskan, noted
that even at their post-peak levels, rents in the Bay Area are among the
highest in the country and three times the average in downtown Omaha.
"The pay here is higher -- I guess most
people know (higher rents are) part of moving out here," Magnuson said.
- by Kelly Zito The
San Francisco Chronicle 26 July
2004
Vacant Dot-Com
Sites in San Francisco Turn Into New Apartments
In a concrete
tower on San Francisco's Market Street, where employees of Internet
companies such as Pets.com once toiled, developers are building the city's
latest hot product: apartments.
Tishman Speyer Properties is converting
the top half of the 40-story building at 575 Market to housing from offices
left vacant in the dot-com bust. "Housing in San Francisco so far has
been a very, very strong performer," said Tishman Managing Director
Ezra Mersey. "We're confident it makes sense."
Developers
that bought or built offices to capitalize on the 1990s Internet boom, when
rents more than doubled in less than four years, are seeking refuge in
housing. San Francisco office rents have fallen 60% from a peak of $ 80.16 a
square foot two years ago, more than in any other U.S. city, broker Cushman
& Wakefield said. About 15 million square feet of space is vacant, equal
to all office space in Portland, Ore.
Equity Office Properties Trust, the
largest U.S. office building owner, recently said that it ended a two-year
venture to build San Francisco offices after investing $ 253 million only to
see vacancies soar. Though costs to retrofit office buildings can limit the
payoff on conversions, developers and brokers say the strategy is preferable
to losing money on an empty building.
"These people are sitting with an
asset saying, 'What should I do about this?' " said Paul Zeger,
president of Pacific Marketing Associates in San Francisco.
The transformation of offices into homes
will help ease what the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ranks as the
nation's tightest housing market, analysts said. Only 14% of residents can
afford the median home price, $ 568,000 in the city.
Nationwide, 58% of residents can pay
their local median rate, the California Realtors Assn. said.
Residential rents in San Francisco are
higher than in any city except New York, rising 0.5% to an average $ 1,832 a
month in the fourth quarter from the third quarter, apartment research
company RealFacts said.
The average U.S. apartment rent fell 0.4%
to $ 905 in the fourth quarter from the previous quarter, according to Reis
Inc.
The increase in city apartment rents
signals the end of a 6.9% decline in those rents from the year-earlier
fourth quarter as companies fired workers, analysts said. No other city is
positioned like San Francisco for conversion to housing from offices,
analysts and developers say.
"We experienced a more pronounced
cycle than anyplace else," said Tom Sullivan, former president of the
dissolved Equity Office venture. "There was so much venture capital
funding jobs. When the jobs went away, it left us with a high vacancy
rate."
San Francisco's office demand is weakest
in the 91-block former industrial area known as South of Market, where
refurbished brick warehouses hold loft apartments, restaurants and offices.
The area lies in the shadow of Tishman Speyer's tower that once served as
the headquarters of ChevronTexaco Corp.
The end of the Internet boom left 49% of
the area's offices empty. The citywide office vacancy rate climbed to 23% in
the fourth quarter of last year from 1.8% in the third quarter of 2000,
brokers say.
"It's a ghost town," Robert
Larscheid, senior vice president at broker Axiant Group, said of the
neighborhood that once was home to Internet retailer Pets.com and data
network provider Northpoint Communications Group Inc. "There's no
migration at all from the financial district and no new business
enterprises."
A.F. Evans Development Co. plans to build
165 apartments in the traditionally industrial area after developer Ron
Kaufman scrapped plans for a 300,000-square-foot headquarters for Internet
software maker Macromedia Inc.
Evans Development also wants to create
250 apartments at the site of a warehouse once intended for offices,
President Charmaine Curtis said.
"Heavy industrial is never going to
relocate there and people don't necessarily want it," Curtis said.
"A more logical transition is housing and mixed use."
Developer Douglas Rosenberg plans a
110-unit condominium project South of Market, where he once intended to
build 110,000 square feet of offices.
"Just about every office developer
in San Francisco has considered the residential option," Rosenberg
said.
Tishman Speyer, based in New York, plans
130 apartments for the former ChevronTexaco building, where cutbacks by
tenants such as Proxicom Inc. left the 40-story tower and a neighboring
20-story office building 87% vacant, property broker Grubb & Ellis said.
Housing costs have been driven up
by a lack of supply in a city with 760,000 residents, said John Crapo, a
director at the San Francisco Center for Economic Development. "The
minimum we should be producing is 3,000 units a year, and we haven't done
that in 12 to 14 years," he said. -
Elizabeth Hayes, Bloomberg
News
Los Angeles Times 27 Jan 2003
Silicon Valley
High-Tech Rents Tumble
Rent in Silicon Valley for high-tech commercial real estate fell almost 30
percent in 2002, extending a slide that began a year earlier, according to a
study released on Thursday.
Annual rent for high-tech work space in
Silicon Valley averaged $15.24 per square foot in the fourth quarter, down
29 percent from $21.48 per square foot in the first quarter, according to
commercial real estate services company Cushman and Wakefield.
Average annual rents in the region had
been as high as $50.88 per square foot in the first quarter of 2001.
Silicon Valley, home to scores of big and
small technology companies, has been hammered by the high-tech industry's
downturn, sending local commercial rents tumbling as companies consolidated
facilities while slashing payrolls.
Silicon Valley had about 30.15 million
square feet of commercial space suited for high-tech companies available for
rent in the fourth quarter of 2002, up 37 percent from 21.96 million square
feet of such vacant space in the first quarter of last year.
The region's vacant high-tech real estate
was a low 3.1 million square feet in the third quarter of 2000 when Silicon
Valley's local economy was booming.
The unemployment rate in Santa
Clara County, the region's heart, was 7.8 percent in November, down from 8.1
percent in the prior month but up substantially from 1.3 percent in December
2000 amid the dot-com boom and torrid business investment in tech goods and
services of all kinds. - Reuters
2 January 2003
|