PROPERTY INSURANCE


 

 

 

 


NORTH AMERICA
NEWS STORY

North American office property owners were dealt a blow yesterday, with news the largest U.S. lender is giving borrowers two weeks to come up with terrorism insurance or risk being in default.

General Motors Corp.'s commercial mortgage servicing unit, which oversees US$100-billion of loans on office buildings, shopping malls and other properties, sent letters to borrowers saying it can declare loans in default or force landlords to pay whatever premium GMAC can arrange.

The policy has created a conflict with one of the largest Canadian real estate companies. Toronto-based Brookfield Properties Corp., which has extensive holdings in New York including parts of the World Financial Center, is suing GMAC over a US $2.1-million bill it was sent .

GMAC sent Brookfield the bill for a terrorism insurance policy GMAC bought for a building the real estate company owns at 245 Park Avenue in New York. GMAC services the tower's US$500 million mortgage.

GMAC bought US$150-million of terrorism coverage for the 44-story tower near Grand Central Terminal. Brookfield has said GMAC's move undercuts its bargaining position with insurers.

Brookfield officials would not comment yesterday, saying it is before the courts. Brookfield, whose properties near the World Trade Center were damaged during the Sept. 11 attacks, became one of the first companies forced to renew its terrorism coverage following the incident

In a conference call with analysts in November, Brookfield said the company has new business interruption and property insurance but only liability risk insurance for terrorism. It has been pushing, with others, for a government supported terrorism risk program.

In the wake of Sept. 11, landlords are finding it more difficult and expensive to find terrorism insurance. Pressure has been building on U.S. legislators to come up with a solution to ease the burden of property owners.

The U.S. Senate began debate Thursday on a bill to provide a backstop to large insurance claims from future terrorist attacks.

"By doing this GMAC is adding fuel to the fire of necessity to get some action out of Congress quickly," said Deborah Beck, executive vice president of the Real Estate Board of New York, a trade group.

Since Sept. 11, many in the insurance industry have refused to include terrorism insurance under all-risk policies, forcing property owners to purchase the coverage separately. The attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon caused US$35-billion damage.

Ross Moore, national research director for Colliers International in Boston, doesn't see the issue going away soon but he also doesn't see any immediate action from Congress.

"It just keeps going back and forth. It's like watching a tennis match," said Mr. Moore, adding it's really only an issue for owners with building in select markets. "If you have shopping mall in Fort Wayne, Ind. it's one thing. If you have Class A building in Manhattan, it's another."    - National Post   20 June 2002

 


Copyright ©  2009
By opening this page you accept our
Privacy and Terms & Conditions