| 
           EXCEPTIONAL
    CHILDREN
     Easing the pressure on prodigies
     In the months leading up to Natalie Lambert's
    historic crossing of Lake Ontario, her mother says she never heard her
    daughter complain about her gruelling practice regimen that consisted of
    three-hour swims in the frigid and choppy lake.So when the 14-year-old
    reached shore in Kingston yesterday to become the youngest to complete the
    marathon swim, Christine Lambert wanted to know two things: Was her child
    safe and was she happy? She says the answer to both was yes. 
    "You have to ensure that whatever it is your
    child is doing, that it is what the child wants and not what you want,"
    said Ms. Lambert, whose 16-year-old daughter, Jenna, also completed a
    marathon swim last year. 
    "I think anyone can judge by the girls that
    this is something they wanted to do," Ms. Lambert said in a telephone
    interview yesterday from a Kingston motel room where Natalie was sleeping
    off her exhaustion. 
    But recent international events suggest that it is
    often not so easy for the public to discern whether children whose
    exceptional abilities and prodigious intellects are on display are driven by
    enjoyment or the desire to fulfill the wishes of parents and coaches. 
    This week, eight-year-old Zhang Huimin's
    3,560-kilometre run across China sparked accusations of child abuse against
    her father, who followed the girl on a motorized bicycle. 
    And in India this month, the coach of
    five-year-old marathon phenom Budhia Singh was arrested after the boy
    accused him of torture. 
    Throughout history, children with remarkable
    physical and mental gifts have often inspired and aroused suspicion, said
    David Henry Feldman, a professor of child development at Tufts University
    and the author of Nature's Gambit: Child Prodigies and the Development of
    Human Potential. 
    "It's very difficult to judge [the
    motivation] from the outside," Dr. Feldman said. 
    "Extreme cases wouldn't be extreme if what
    the kids were doing wasn't unusual, and that arouses a whole array of
    responses and reactions." 
    What is more recent, Dr. Feldman and other experts
    said, are the difficulties modern society imposes on children with
    extraordinary promise. 
    "In a very complex society with very high
    expectations for kids ... where talents are clear and rewards of fame and
    fortune very attractive, [it is] very compelling" for parents to
    attempt to nurture a child's ability, Dr. Feldman said. 
    At the same time, psychologists said, exceptional
    children who are on display are, in most cases, testing the limits of their
    own abilities. 
    Wayne Gretzky and Tiger Woods are examples of
    child athletes whose talents garnered national media attention before they
    were out of elementary school. Yet both have publicly described practising
    their respective sports for hours on end when they were children as
    something they chose to do and their parents supported. 
    Psychologists say it is sometimes difficult even
    for parents who do not push their children to know whether the child truly
    enjoys exercising his or her talent or is attempting to please the parents. 
    "The kids who are incredibly talented
    generally are pushing themselves and pulling their parents along," said
    Ellen Winner, a professor of psychology at Boston College and the author of Gifted
    Children: Myths and Realities. 
    Dr. Winner said the best thing parents of children
    with accelerated abilities can do is recognize that they have atypical
    children and enable them to master their talents without turning family life
    upside down to accommodate them. 
    "Most parents don't find the balance,"
    Dr. Winner said. "Sometimes you can't make the distinction between
    where the parent ends and the child begins." 
    Case studies of prodigies suggest that pushing
    them to excel can leave them feeling even more isolated than many already
    feel, living in a world where their abilities are sometimes regarded as
    freakish. 
    And making predictions of greatness is especially
    dangerous for prodigies, experts said, because it places them under extreme
    pressure to live up to expectations. 
    William James Sidis, who, it was reported, began
    reading adult books at age 2 and entered Harvard in 1909 at age 11, was
    hounded by a press corps eager to follow his path to a stardom that
    ultimately failed to materialize. 
    Alan Edmunds, an associate professor of
    educational psychology at the University of Western Ontario who has worked
    with remarkable children for more than 20 years, said it is critical for
    adults to not place too much pressure on precocious children. 
    He said such children have a hard enough time
    coping with being viewed as different without shouldering expectations such
    as teachers deferring to them in the classroom, or adults holding them up as
    examples of how other children should be performing. 
    Taking the pressure off exceptional children is
    the reason Dr. Edmunds said he shies from using the word
    "prodigy." 
    "The problem with 'prodigy' is it comes laden
    with a requirement for a continuous upward trajectory of a child's
    capabilities," Dr. Edmunds said. "There's only been one child
    prodigy who lived up to the term, and that was Mozart."
    - by David Andreatta   GLOBE
    & MAIL   2007 August 2007 
     
    
  
  |